“Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously:”
My Notes
What Does 1 Peter 2:23 Mean?
1 Peter 2:23 describes Christ's response to injustice — and the response is defined entirely by what He didn't do. "Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again" — hos loidoroumenos ouk anteloidorei. Loidoreō — to abuse verbally, to heap insults, to revile. When it was done to Him (loidoroumenos — being reviled, receiving verbal abuse), He did not (ouk) do it back (anteloidorei — return the insult, revile in response). The first non-action: no verbal retaliation.
"When he suffered, he threatened not" — paschōn ouk ēpeilei. When He suffered (paschōn — experiencing pain, enduring affliction), He did not threaten (ēpeilei — issue warnings of retribution, promise future harm). The second non-action: no intimidation. He didn't say: you'll pay for this. He didn't promise revenge. He didn't warn His executioners about what was coming for them.
"But committed himself to him that judgeth righteously" — paredidou de tō krinonti dikaiōs. Paredidou — He handed over, He entrusted, He committed. The word is the same used for Judas handing Jesus to the authorities. Jesus handed Himself — not to His enemies but to the One who judges righteously. Tō krinonti dikaiōs — the righteous Judge. The One whose verdicts are always right. Jesus entrusted His case — the margin reads "his cause" — to the only Judge whose evaluation is perfect.
The verse presents three responses: no retaliation, no threats, and active trust. The first two are negative — what He didn't do. The third is positive — what He did. He didn't fight back. He didn't promise revenge. He committed His case to the One qualified to handle it. The response wasn't passivity. It was redirection — from self-defense to divine defense.
Reflection Questions
- 1.When you're reviled, do you revile back? What would Christ's non-retaliation look like in your specific situation?
- 2.What's the difference between passivity (doing nothing) and commitment (handing your case to the righteous Judge)?
- 3.How does knowing Christ had the power to retaliate but chose not to redefine what strength looks like?
- 4.What injustice do you need to commit to the righteous Judge instead of handling yourself?
Devotional
Reviled: didn't revile back. Suffering: didn't threaten. Instead: handed His case to the righteous Judge.
Christ's response to injustice is a masterclass in what strength actually looks like — and it looks nothing like what the world calls strong. No verbal retaliation when insulted. No threats when suffering. No promise of revenge when the pain was actively being inflicted. The man with twelve legions of angels at His disposal (Matthew 26:53) absorbed every insult without returning a single one.
The non-actions are the discipline. Not reviling back requires more strength than reviling. The instinct to retaliate is so deeply wired into human nature that suppressing it feels like holding back a flood. Not threatening when you're suffering — when every fiber of your body wants to say: you'll regret this — requires the kind of internal authority that most people never develop. The silence of the suffering Christ isn't weakness. It's the most controlled expression of power in human history.
But the positive action is the theology: He committed Himself to Him that judgeth righteously. Paredidou — handed over, entrusted. Jesus didn't swallow the injustice and pretend it didn't matter. He placed it in the hands of the only Judge whose verdict is guaranteed to be right. The case wasn't dropped. It was transferred — from a human courtroom where the verdict was rigged to a divine courtroom where the verdict is always righteous.
That's the model for your response to injustice. Not: absorb it and pretend it doesn't hurt. Not: retaliate and make them pay. Commit it — hand it over, entrust it, place the entire case in the hands of the Judge who never gets it wrong. The injustice is real. Your response is trust. And the Judge is righteous.
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
Who his own self bare our sins,.... As was typified by the high priest bearing the sins of the holy things of the people…
Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again - He did not use harsh and opprobrious words in return for those which he…
But committed himself - Though he could have inflicted any kind of punishment on his persecutors, yet to give us, in…
The general rule of a Christian conversation is this, it must be honest, which it cannot be if there be not a…
Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again Here again, though we have no direct quotation, it is impossible to overlook…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture