Skip to content

Acts 13:8

Acts 13:8
But Elymas the sorcerer (for so is his name by interpretation) withstood them, seeking to turn away the deputy from the faith.

My Notes

What Does Acts 13:8 Mean?

Bar-jesus (Elymas), a sorcerer attached to the Roman deputy's court, actively opposes Paul and Barnabas. His method: trying to turn the deputy away from the faith. The opposition isn't passive. He "withstood" them (anthistēmi — to set oneself against, to resist face-to-face) and actively sought to redirect the deputy's interest away from the gospel.

The sorcerer's position is strategic: he's embedded in the deputy's household. His influence is established. His access is continuous. And the gospel threatens his arrangement. If the deputy believes, the sorcerer loses his patron. The opposition to the gospel is economically motivated — spiritual influence is his livelihood.

Paul's response (verses 9-11) is the most dramatic confrontation in Acts: filled with the Holy Ghost, Paul calls Elymas a child of the devil, an enemy of righteousness, full of deceit and mischief. Then he pronounces blindness. The sorcerer who tried to keep the deputy in spiritual darkness is struck with physical darkness.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Where is spiritual opposition to the gospel in your context economically motivated (someone's livelihood depends on people NOT believing)?
  • 2.Does Elymas's method (redirecting rather than arguing) describe a form of opposition you've encountered?
  • 3.How does the judgment (spiritual darkener struck with physical darkness) model divine proportionality?
  • 4.Have you seen opposition to the gospel PRODUCE faith in the observers — the way the deputy believed after watching the confrontation?

Devotional

The sorcerer fought the gospel. Actively. Strategically. Because if the governor believed, the sorcerer's livelihood was finished.

Elymas doesn't just disagree with Paul. He withstands — sets himself directly against the apostles, face-to-face, with deliberate opposition. His method: turning the deputy away from faith. Not arguing theology. Redirecting influence. Using his position in the deputy's household to steer the governor away from the gospel before it can take root.

The opposition is economic before it's theological: Elymas is a court sorcerer. His livelihood depends on the deputy's patronage. If the deputy becomes a Christian, the sorcerer becomes unnecessary. The gospel threatens his income, his access, and his influence. The spiritual opposition has a financial engine underneath it.

Paul sees through to the real dynamic (verse 10): "O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness." The sorcerer isn't a confused seeker. He's a knowing enemy. The deceit is deliberate. The opposition is satanic. And the motivation is the preservation of a corrupt arrangement.

The judgment is poetic: Elymas tried to keep the deputy in spiritual darkness. Paul strikes Elymas with physical darkness (verse 11: "thou shalt be blind, not seeing the sun for a season"). The man who dealt in spiritual blindness receives literal blindness. The instrument matches the intention. You darkened eyes? You'll lose your own.

The deputy, watching all of this, believes (verse 12). The sorcerer's opposition — which was supposed to prevent faith — becomes the occasion for faith. The confrontation that should have scared the governor away drove him toward the gospel instead. The enemy's attack became the convert's evidence.

Every opposition to the gospel contains the seeds of the gospel's advance. The sorcerer lost. The deputy believed. And the darkness that was aimed at others landed on the one who deployed it.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

But Elymas the sorcerer, for so is his name by interpretation,.... Not that Magus a sorcerer is by interpretation…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

}But Elymas the sorcerer (for so is his name by interpretation) - Elymas the magician. Elymas is the interpretation, not…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

But Elymas, the sorcerer, (for so is his name by interpretation) - That is, Elymas is the interpretation of the word…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Acts 13:4-13

In these verses we have,

I. A general account of the coming of Barnabas and Saul to the famous island of Cyprus; and…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

seeking to turn away[aside] the deputy[proconsul] from the faith Sergius had not yet accepted the doctrine of the…