Skip to content

Daniel 1:7

Daniel 1:7
Unto whom the prince of the eunuchs gave names: for he gave unto Daniel the name of Belteshazzar; and to Hananiah, of Shadrach; and to Mishael, of Meshach; and to Azariah, of Abednego.

My Notes

What Does Daniel 1:7 Mean?

"Unto whom the prince of the eunuchs gave names: for he gave unto Daniel the name of Belteshazzar; and to Hananiah, of Shadrach; and to Mishael, of Meshach; and to Azariah, of Abednego." The Babylonian official renames the four Hebrew youths: their God-honoring Hebrew names are replaced with names honoring Babylonian deities. Daniel ('God is my judge') becomes Belteshazzar ('Bel protect his life'). Hananiah ('the LORD is gracious') becomes Shadrach. Mishael ('who is what God is?') becomes Meshach. Azariah ('the LORD has helped') becomes Abednego ('servant of Nebo'). The renaming is the empire's attempt to rewrite identity.

The phrase "the prince of the eunuchs gave names" (vayyasem lahem sar hassarisim shemot — the chief of the eunuchs placed/set upon them names) makes the renaming an act of AUTHORITY: names weren't just labels. Names were IDENTITY — they declared who you belonged to, which god you served, what your parents believed about God. The Babylonian official doesn't just rename. He RE-IDENTIFIES. The act is cultural colonization through nomenclature.

The four Hebrew names all reference the God of Israel (El or Yah): Daniel (El), Hananiah (Yah), Mishael (El), Azariah (Yah). The four Babylonian replacements reference Babylonian gods (Bel, Aku, Nebo). The renaming systematically replaces YHWH-references with pagan-god-references. The identity erasure is theological — removing God's name from the person's name.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.What has the world renamed you — and does your original God-given identity persist underneath?
  • 2.How does renaming function as cultural colonization — and where do you see it operating?
  • 3.What does Daniel keeping his Hebrew identity despite the Babylonian name teach about internal persistence?
  • 4.What theology is carried in YOUR name — and has anything tried to erase it?

Devotional

Daniel becomes Belteshazzar. Hananiah becomes Shadrach. Mishael becomes Meshach. Azariah becomes Abednego. Four Hebrew names honoring the God of Israel are replaced with four Babylonian names honoring pagan gods. The empire renames you to RE-IDENTIFY you. The colonization starts with the name.

The Hebrew names carried THEOLOGY: Daniel means 'God is my judge' — the boy's identity declared divine judgment. Hananiah means 'the LORD is gracious' — the name proclaimed divine grace. Mishael asks 'who is what God is?' — the name declared divine incomparability. Azariah means 'the LORD has helped' — the name testified to divine assistance. Every time someone called these boys by name, they were declaring something about God.

The Babylonian names ERASED the theology and replaced it: Belteshazzar invokes Bel (Marduk). Abednego means 'servant of Nebo.' The names that once proclaimed YHWH's judgment, grace, incomparability, and help now proclaim service to Babylonian deities. The renaming is cultural colonization at its most intimate level — replacing the god-reference in your very identity.

But the renaming FAILS: Daniel is still Daniel. The book carries his HEBREW name. The Babylonian name never replaces the Hebrew identity in God's narrative. The empire can rename the body. The empire can't rename the soul. The external label changes. The internal identity persists. Daniel serves Babylon by day and prays toward Jerusalem at night. The new name is the uniform. The old name is the person.

What has the 'empire' renamed you — and does the original identity still persist underneath?

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

Unto whom the prince of the eunuchs gave names,.... Other names, Chaldee names, according to the names of the gods of…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

Unto whom the prince of the eunuchs gave names - This practice is common in Oriental courts. “The captive youths…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Unto whom the prince of the eunuchs gave names - This change of names, Calmet properly remarks, was a mark of dominion…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Daniel 1:1-7

We have in these verses an account,

I. Of the first descent which Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, in the first year of…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

And the prince of the eunuchs gave names unto them: unto Daniel he gave, &c. as R.V. -Prince" (Heb. sar, i.e. here,…