Skip to content

Galatians 3:21

Galatians 3:21
Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid : for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.

My Notes

What Does Galatians 3:21 Mean?

Paul anticipates the logical objection: if righteousness comes by faith and not by law, is the law opposed to God's promises? If faith is the mechanism and the law isn't, does that make the law God's enemy? His answer is immediate: mē genoito — God forbid, absolutely not. The law and the promises aren't in opposition. They have different functions.

The key clause: "if there had been a law given which could have given life" — ei gar edothē nomos ho dynamenos zōopoiēsai. If any law had the power (dynamenos — being able, having capacity) to give life (zōopoiēsai — to make alive, to vivify), then yes — righteousness would have come through the law. The law would have been sufficient. Faith wouldn't have been necessary. But no law has that power. The law can define righteousness. It cannot produce it. It can show you what alive looks like. It cannot make you alive.

The law's limitation isn't a design flaw. It's a design feature. The law was never intended to give life. It was intended to reveal the need for life (v. 22: "the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe"). The law's job is to prove that you can't save yourself, thereby driving you to the one who can. The law isn't against the promises. It's the usher that escorts you to them.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Have you been treating the law as the source of spiritual life — trying to rule-keep your way into the righteousness you're seeking?
  • 2.If no law can make you alive, what does that say about the disciplines and standards you rely on for your sense of spiritual health?
  • 3.How is the law an 'usher' to grace rather than an opponent of it?
  • 4.Where do you need to stop trying to generate life through performance and start receiving it through faith?

Devotional

Is the law against God's promises? No. It's the usher. The law walks you to the door of grace and says: you can't open this yourself. You need someone else. That's not opposition. That's introduction. The law's purpose was never to save you. It was to prove that you need saving — and to point you toward the one who provides it.

If the law could have given life, it would have. Paul says so explicitly. If any set of commandments, any moral code, any religious performance had the power to make you alive — to produce genuine, lasting, God-quality righteousness — then faith would be unnecessary. But no law can do that. Not because the law is bad. Because the law acts on the outside and the problem is on the inside. The law can describe health. It can't cure the disease. It can draw the blueprint of a righteous life. It can't build one in you.

The relief in this verse is immense if you've been trying to law your way into life. The rules. The disciplines. The self-imposed standards that you've been using as the mechanism of your spiritual growth — and failing. Paul says: no law was given that could make you alive. The life you're looking for doesn't come from the commandments you're keeping. It comes from the faith that the commandments were always pointing toward. The law isn't your enemy. But it's not your savior either. It's the diagnostic that proves you need one. And the Savior is standing right behind the diagnosis, waiting to do what the law never could.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

Is the law then against the promises of God?.... If the law was added because of transgressions, and curses for them,…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

Is the law then against the promises of God? - Is the Law of Moses to be regarded as opposed to the promises made to…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Is the law then against the promises of God? - Is it possible that the intervention of the law, in reference to one part…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Galatians 3:19-29

The apostle having just before been speaking of the promise made to Abraham, and representing that as the rule of our…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

Having thus sharply contrasted the two covenants, the Apostle anticipates an objection -You say that God is One. He is…