Skip to content

Job 15:14

Job 15:14
What is man, that he should be clean? and he which is born of a woman, that he should be righteous?

My Notes

What Does Job 15:14 Mean?

Job 15:14 is spoken by Eliphaz in his second speech, and while his overall argument is flawed — he's using theology as a weapon against Job — this particular question strikes bedrock. "What is man, that he should be clean?" — mah-enosh ki-yizkeh. The word enosh (man, mortal) emphasizes human frailty. Zakah means to be pure, clean, innocent. "And he which is born of a woman, that he should be righteous?" — yeled-ishah ki-yitsddaq. Born of woman — that is, finite, mortal, flesh-derived. The question implies its own answer: no one born into human flesh can claim purity before God.

Eliphaz echoes a question Job himself raised in 14:4: "Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one." The theological point transcends the speaker's motives. Human nature, in its fallen condition, cannot produce the kind of righteousness that stands in God's courtroom. Not because humans are worthless, but because the gap between divine holiness and human capacity is uncrossable by human effort.

Verse 15 amplifies the point: "Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight." If even angelic beings and the heavens themselves fall short of God's purity standard, the question about human cleanness becomes rhetorical. The problem isn't that some people are unclean while others make it. The problem is universal. The solution, as the rest of Scripture will reveal, must come from outside humanity entirely.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.How do you respond to the claim that no human being can be clean before God? Does it feel liberating or discouraging?
  • 2.Where have you been trying to manufacture your own righteousness instead of receiving God's?
  • 3.If even the heavens aren't clean in God's sight, what does that tell you about the standard — and about who can meet it?
  • 4.How does this question point you toward the gospel rather than toward despair?

Devotional

What is man, that he should be clean? It's a question that sounds hopeless — and it's meant to.

Eliphaz asks it as an argument against Job, which misuses a true principle. But the principle itself is one of the most honest assessments of the human condition in Scripture. Born of a woman. Finite. Mortal. Shaped by desires and limitations and a nature that tilts, however slightly, away from perfection. What are the odds that someone made of this material could stand clean before infinite holiness?

Zero. That's the answer. And that's not cruelty — it's clarity. Because the moment you stop trying to manufacture your own cleanness, you become open to receiving someone else's. The entire gospel is built on this question. What is man, that he should be clean? He can't be — not on his own. And God knew that before He ever made the first one.

If you've been exhausting yourself trying to be clean enough — good enough, pure enough, disciplined enough to earn God's approval — Eliphaz's question is a strange kind of mercy. Stop. You can't get there from here. Not because you're garbage, but because the distance between human and holy is too great for human legs to cross. Someone has to carry you. And someone did.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

What is man, that he should be clean?.... Frail, feeble, mortal man, or woeful man, as Mr. Broughton renders it; since…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

What is man that he should be clean? - The object of Eliphaz in this is to overturn the positions of Job that he was…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Job 15:1-16

Eliphaz here falls very foul upon Job, because he contradicted what he and his colleagues had said, and did not…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

What is there to justify such passion thy pretended innocence? What is man that he should be clean? cf. ch. Job 14:1.…