Skip to content

Matthew 22:43

Matthew 22:43
He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying,

My Notes

What Does Matthew 22:43 Mean?

"He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying." Jesus poses the question that silences ALL opposition: if the Messiah is David's son, why does David call the Messiah LORD? The question exposes the limitation of the 'son of David' title: a father doesn't call his son 'Lord.' The Messiah must be MORE than just David's descendant. He must be David's LORD — which requires a nature higher than David's.

The phrase "David in spirit" (Dauid en pneumati — David in/by the Spirit) means David's words in Psalm 110:1 were SPIRIT-INSPIRED: David didn't call the Messiah 'Lord' by his own reasoning. He spoke BY THE SPIRIT — under divine inspiration, seeing by prophetic insight what natural sight couldn't see. The Spirit enabled David to recognize the Messiah as his LORD, not just his descendant.

The question "how then doth David call him Lord?" (pōs oun Dauid en pneumati kalei auton kyrion — how then does David in spirit call Him Lord?) creates a LOGICAL puzzle the Pharisees can't solve: if the Messiah is David's son, David is GREATER (fathers outrank sons in the ancient world). But if David calls the Messiah LORD, the Messiah is GREATER. Both can't be true unless the Messiah is BOTH David's son (human descent) AND David's Lord (divine nature). The question points to the incarnation without naming it.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Do you see Jesus as merely human descendant — or also as divine Lord?
  • 2.How does David calling his own son 'Lord' create a puzzle only the incarnation solves?
  • 3.What does 'in spirit' (Spirit-inspired speech) teach about David seeing what natural sight couldn't?
  • 4.What does this question being UNANSWERABLE by the Pharisees teach about the limits of human theology?

Devotional

If the Messiah is David's SON — how does David call Him LORD? Fathers don't call sons 'Lord.' The question creates a puzzle that can only be solved by what the Pharisees refuse to consider: the Messiah is BOTH human descendant AND divine Lord. David's son AND David's God.

The 'David in spirit call him Lord' establishes that David spoke PROPHETICALLY: this wasn't David's casual observation. It was SPIRIT-INSPIRED speech. David saw, by the Spirit, something about the Messiah that exceeded the natural son-of-David expectation. The Spirit showed David that his descendant would be his SUPERIOR — not just his heir but his LORD.

The logical puzzle is the point: in the ancient world, the father ALWAYS outranked the son. If the Messiah is David's son, David is greater. BUT — David calls the Messiah LORD (Psalm 110:1). Lords outrank those who call them Lord. So the Messiah outranks David. But how can a SON outrank a FATHER? Only if the son is MORE than a son. Only if the descendant is also the DEITY. The question can't be answered within a purely human framework.

The question POINTS to the incarnation without NAMING it: Jesus doesn't say 'I am God and David's son.' He asks a QUESTION that makes both truths necessary. The answer requires BOTH — the Messiah must be fully David's descendant (human) AND fully David's Lord (divine). The question creates the space for the doctrine of the incarnation by showing that the Messiah can't be understood as merely human.

Do you see Jesus as David's son only — or also as David's Lord? And does the difference matter?

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

And no man was able to answer him a word,.... They saw the dilemma they were reduced to, either to acknowledge the deity…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870Matthew 22:41-46

Jesus proposes a question concerning the Messiah - See also Mar 12:35-37; Luk 20:41-44. Mat 22:41 While the Pharisees…