Skip to content

Numbers 24:20

Numbers 24:20
And when he looked on Amalek, he took up his parable, and said, Amalek was the first of the nations; but his latter end shall be that he perish for ever.

My Notes

What Does Numbers 24:20 Mean?

"Amalek was the first of the nations; but his latter end shall be that he perish for ever." Balaam prophesies over Amalek — the first nation to attack Israel after the Exodus (Exodus 17:8). Amalek's historical priority ("first of the nations" to oppose Israel) doesn't protect it from future destruction. Being first doesn't mean lasting. The early advantage becomes the eventual annihilation.

The phrase "first of the nations" (reshit goyim) can mean either the first in time (first to attack) or the first in power (preeminent among nations). Either way, the firstness is temporary: the latter end is perishing forever. The beginning was impressive. The ending is absolute destruction.

The perpetual destruction — "perish for ever" (adey oved — unto perishing, to the point of destruction) — means Amalek's end is total and permanent. No remnant. No recovery. No future restoration. The nation that attacked Israel first is the nation that disappears completely. The aggression that seemed strong produces the destruction that is permanent.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.What 'Amalek' — force that attacks the vulnerable — seems powerful but has a 'perish forever' future?
  • 2.Why does first-mover aggression against God's people produce permanent destruction?
  • 3.What does targeting the weak and the stragglers produce in the long run?
  • 4.How does the firstness/lastness pattern (first to attack, first to perish) apply to current aggressors?

Devotional

First among the nations. Last on the list of the surviving. Amalek's head start — first to attack Israel, possibly first in regional power — doesn't protect it from permanent destruction. Being first doesn't mean lasting.

The Amalek pattern is the pattern of every aggressive first-mover who attacks God's people: the early advantage looks decisive. The initial attack seems successful. The firstness feels like dominance. But the latter end tells the real story: the aggressor perishes. The attacked survives. The first becomes the forgotten.

Historically, Amalek attacked Israel at their most vulnerable — exhausted, newly freed, barely organized (Exodus 17:8). The attack was opportunistic, targeting the stragglers (Deuteronomy 25:18). The strategy was cowardly: hit the weakest when they're weakest. And the strategy's long-term result: perpetual divine hostility and eventual total destruction.

The 'perish for ever' means no comeback. No reinvention. No resilient recovery. The destruction is permanent because the offense was fundamental: attacking God's people at their weakest established a permanent enmity that the aggressor can't survive.

What 'Amalek' in your world — what force that attacks the vulnerable, that targets the weak, that hits the stragglers — seems powerful now but has a 'perish forever' written over its future? The first-mover advantage of the aggressor is temporary. The protection of the attacked is permanent.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

And he looked on the Kenites,.... Not the family and posterity of Jethro, as Aben Ezra, Jarchi, and Abendana; for they…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

When he looked - i. e., in spirit, as he saw the Star Num 24:17. Amalek was the first of the nations - Rather, is…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Numbers 24:15-25

The office of prophets was both to bless and to prophesy in the name of the Lord. Balaam, as a prophet, per force had…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

The utterance on Amalek.

And he saw Amalek The country of the Amalekites and that of the Kenites (Num 24:24) might be…