Skip to content

Numbers 5:22

Numbers 5:22
And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen.

My Notes

What Does Numbers 5:22 Mean?

"And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen." In the ordeal of jealousy (Numbers 5:11-31), the suspected woman drinks the 'bitter water' — and the RESULTS are conditional: if GUILTY, the water causes physical consequences (belly swelling, thigh rotting). The woman AGREES to the test by saying 'Amen, amen' — a double affirmation that means 'truly, truly' or 'so be it, so be it.' The consent is VERBAL, DOUBLE, and SOLEMN. The woman accepts the test's terms.

The phrase "this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels" (hammayim hame'ararim ha'elleh beme'ayikh — these curse-causing waters into your intestines) describes the water ENTERING the body: the water goes INSIDE — into the bowels, the intestines, the interior. The test operates INTERNALLY. The water that carries the curse enters the body and produces consequences from WITHIN. The judgment is INTERNAL, not external.

The "the woman shall say, Amen, amen" (ve'amerah ha'ishah amen amen — the woman shall say truly truly) is the CONSENT that makes the ordeal VOLUNTARY: the woman AGREES — verbally, publicly, with the doubled affirmation. The 'amen, amen' means 'I accept. I consent. Let it be so.' The double amen is the double agreement. The woman isn't forced without consent. She AFFIRMS the test. The consent is the integrity of the process.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.What situation lacks human evidence — and requires divine adjudication?
  • 2.What does the test operating INTERNALLY (not through external examination) teach about divine judgment?
  • 3.How does the double 'amen' (consent before the ordeal) model voluntary submission to divine testing?
  • 4.What does the ordeal VINDICATING the innocent (verse 28) teach about God's testing being fair?

Devotional

The curse-water enters the body. If guilty — the belly swells, the thigh rots. And the woman says: AMEN, AMEN. The consent is double. The agreement is verbal and solemn. The woman accepts the terms of the test. The ordeal is agreed to before it's undergone. The amen is the consent.

The 'water that causeth the curse' is the TEST administered internally: the water enters the BOWELS — the interior, the hidden, the place where only GOD sees. The test doesn't operate through external examination or human investigation. It operates INTERNALLY — inside the woman's body, where only God can produce or withhold the consequences. The internal operation makes God the JUDGE, not the priest. The priest administers. God ADJUDICATES.

The 'amen, amen' is the DOUBLE CONSENT: the woman says 'so be it' TWICE — a solemn, emphatic, public agreement. The doubling isn't accidental. It's EMPHATIC — yes AND yes. Truly AND truly. The consent is as strong as language can make it. The woman voluntarily submits to divine judgment. The test that might VINDICATE her (verse 28 — 'if she be not defiled, she shall be free') or CONDEMN her operates with her OWN AGREEMENT.

The ordeal addresses JEALOUSY without evidence: the husband suspects but can't PROVE (verse 14 — 'the spirit of jealousy came upon him'). The ordeal replaces HUMAN investigation with DIVINE adjudication. Where human evidence is absent, divine testing operates. The bitter water is the mechanism by which God — not the husband, not the priest, not the court — determines guilt or innocence.

What situation in your life has no human evidence — and requires divine adjudication rather than human judgment?

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

And this water that causeth the curse,.... Upon the drinking of which the curse follows, if guilty:

shall go into thy…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870Numbers 5:11-31

The trial of jealousy. Since the crime of adultery is especially defiling and destructive of the very foundations of…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Numbers 5:11-31

We have here the law concerning the solemn trial of a wife whose husband was jealous of her. Observe,

I. What was the…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921Numbers 5:11-31

The Ordeal of Jealousy.

Though in its present form a late priestly composition this section is evidently based upon…