- Bible
- Revelation
- Chapter 2
- Verse 14
“But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.”
My Notes
What Does Revelation 2:14 Mean?
Jesus rebukes the church in Pergamos for tolerating the doctrine of Balaam — a teaching that led God's people into sexual immorality and eating food sacrificed to idols. The issue is not just that false doctrine exists but that the church tolerates it.
"Thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam" — the problem is not that the doctrine arrived from outside. It is that the church has people inside who hold it. The doctrine has been given a seat.
Balaam's method (Numbers 31:16) was to lure Israel into compromise through sexual temptation and idolatrous meals — not frontal assault but seduction. The doctrine is about compromise that feels like freedom.
Jesus' concern is not primarily with the false teachers but with the church that allows them to remain. The tolerance is the sin. A church that knows better and permits the doctrine is accountable for the permission.
Reflection Questions
- 1.How is tolerating false doctrine different from teaching it — and why is both held accountable?
- 2.What does 'the doctrine of Balaam' look like today — seduction through compromise?
- 3.Where is your church or community tolerating what Jesus would rebuke?
- 4.How do you distinguish between grace-filled patience and harmful tolerance of error?
Devotional
I have a few things against thee. Jesus has a complaint — not with outsiders but with the church. The issue is not that false doctrine exists in the world. It is that it exists inside the church. And the church allows it.
Thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam. Balaam did not attack Israel directly. He seduced them — through sexual compromise and idolatrous meals. The doctrine is not frontal heresy. It is subtle permission to compromise.
The church in Pergamos was not teaching Balaam's doctrine. It was tolerating it. The distinction matters: you do not have to promote error to be responsible for it. You just have to permit it.
The doctrine of Balaam is alive in every era: the teaching that grace permits compromise. That freedom in Christ includes freedom to indulge. That you can worship God and eat at the table of idols simultaneously.
Jesus does not just oppose false doctrine. He opposes the tolerance of it. The church that knows better but says nothing is the church Jesus has things against.
What are you tolerating in your community that you know is wrong? Not what are you practicing — what are you permitting? The tolerance is the sin Jesus addresses. The doctrine would have no home if the church refused to give it one.
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
But I have a few things against thee,.... The members of this church before their open separation from the apostasy; who…
But I have a few things against thee - As against the church at Ephesus, Rev 2:4. The charge against this church,…
I have a few things against thee - Their good deeds are first carefully sought out and commended; what was wrong in them…
Here also we are to consider,
I. The inscription of this message. 1. To whom it was sent: To the angel of the church of…
that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught As we should say "who adhere to the practice taught by Balaam, of eating.…"…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture