Skip to content

Romans 3:30

Romans 3:30
Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.

My Notes

What Does Romans 3:30 Mean?

"Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith." Paul grounds the UNITY of the justification-method in the UNITY of God: there is ONE GOD. Therefore there is ONE method of justification — FAITH. The circumcised (Jews) are justified BY faith. The uncircumcised (Gentiles) are justified THROUGH faith. The prepositions differ slightly (ek pisteōs / dia tēs pisteōs). The substance is the same: FAITH is the instrument for BOTH groups because GOD is one for both groups.

The phrase "seeing it is one God" (eiper heis ho theos — if indeed God is one) makes MONOTHEISM the foundation for UNIVERSAL justification: if there's only ONE God (and there is), then that one God justifies BOTH groups by the SAME means. The oneness of God produces the oneness of the justification-method. Separate gods could have separate methods. One God has one method: faith.

The "circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith" (hos dikaiōsei peritomēn ek pisteōs kai akrobystian dia tēs pisteōs — who will justify circumcision from/by faith and uncircumcision through faith) applies the SAME principle to BOTH groups with slightly different prepositions: the circumcision (Jews) are justified BY (ek — out of, from) faith. The uncircumcision (Gentiles) are justified THROUGH (dia — through, by means of) faith. The theological substance is identical. The preposition-variation may indicate that Jews come to faith FROM their covenant background while Gentiles come THROUGH faith as their entry point.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Do you believe one God justifies both groups by the same means — and does that level the ground?
  • 2.What does monotheism (one God) producing universalism (one method) teach about the scope of the gospel?
  • 3.How does faith being sufficient for BOTH (circumcised and uncircumcised) eliminate every addition to the gospel?
  • 4.What does the different prepositions (by/through) teach about different starting points arriving at the same place?

Devotional

ONE God. ONE method: faith. The circumcised are justified BY faith. The uncircumcised are justified THROUGH faith. The prepositions differ. The substance is identical. Because God is ONE, the justification is ONE — faith for BOTH. The monotheism produces the universalism. One God means one way.

The 'seeing it is one God' is the THEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: if there were TWO gods — one for Jews and one for Gentiles — there could be two methods. But there's ONE God. And one God justifies one WAY. The oneness of the justifier determines the oneness of the justification. The monotheism that Israel has proclaimed for centuries (Deuteronomy 6:4 — 'the LORD our God is one LORD') now produces the UNIVERSAL application of faith-justification.

The 'circumcision by faith AND uncircumcision through faith' covers BOTH groups under the SAME principle: the Jew is justified by faith. The Gentile is justified by faith. The circumcision doesn't ADD to faith for the Jew. The uncircumcision doesn't SUBTRACT from faith for the Gentile. Faith is sufficient for BOTH. The sign (circumcision) doesn't improve the method. The absence of the sign doesn't diminish it.

The slight PREPOSITION difference (ek/dia — by/through) may reflect different STARTING POINTS: the Jew comes to faith FROM (ek) within the covenant tradition — the Law, the prophets, the promises pointed toward faith. The Gentile comes to faith THROUGH (dia) faith itself — faith is the DOORWAY they enter by, not the destination they were already journeying toward. Different starting points. Same destination. Same instrument. Same God.

Do you believe ONE God justifies BOTH groups by the SAME means — and does that level the ground you stand on?

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870Romans 3:29-30

Is he the God ... - The Jews supposed that he was the God of their nation only, that they only were to be admitted to…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Seeing it is one God - επιπερ εις ο θεος. This has been rendered, Seeing God is one. It however makes little difference…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Romans 3:19-31

From all this Paul infers that it is in vain to look for justification by the works of the law, and that it is to be had…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

seeing it is one God This ver. may be lit. rendered thus: If indeed God is one, who will (and He will) justify the…