“And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.”
My Notes
What Does Romans 3:8 Mean?
"And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just." Paul addresses a deliberate misrepresentation of his teaching. His opponents claimed he was saying: since grace increases with sin, let's sin more to get more grace. Paul calls this exactly what it is — slander. And he pronounces the condemnation of those who actually teach such a thing as "just."
This verse reveals that the gospel of grace has always been vulnerable to being twisted into a license for sin. If Paul is being slandered with this accusation in the first century, it confirms he was actually preaching radical grace — because only genuine grace can be misunderstood this way. A message of works-righteousness would never generate this particular objection.
Reflection Questions
- 1.Have you ever been accused of taking grace 'too far' — and was the accusation fair?
- 2.Why does genuine grace always get accused of being a license for sin?
- 3.How do you hold together the reality of free, unconditional grace with the expectation of transformed living?
- 4.What does it reveal about a person's understanding of God when they think grace must lead to sin?
Devotional
People were saying Paul taught: sin more, get more grace. It was a lie — a deliberate misrepresentation of his message. And Paul calls it out directly: this is slander. And anyone who actually teaches this deserves what's coming to them.
Here's the paradox: the fact that Paul's message could be twisted this way proves he was teaching the real thing. If Paul had been preaching a message of earning your way to God — do more, try harder, be better — nobody would have accused him of promoting sin. That accusation only makes sense as a distortion of genuine, radical grace. The message of unearned, unconditional favor is so scandalous that the only way critics can process it is to say: he must be telling people to sin.
This still happens. Every time someone preaches grace without conditions, someone else says: that's a license to sin. And every time, the accusation reveals more about the accuser than the preacher. If your understanding of grace is so transactional that you assume free grace must produce free sin, you haven't understood grace at all.
Real grace doesn't produce a desire to sin. It produces the opposite — a transformed heart that loves righteousness because it's been loved freely. But the critics will always exist, and they'll always say the same thing: that message is dangerous. And they'll always be wrong — because the dangerous message is the one that actually saves.
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
What then? are we better than they?.... The apostle returns to what he was treating of in the beginning of the chapter,…
And not rather - This is the answer of the apostle. He meets the objection by showing its tendency if carried out, and…
Apostle. And not rather, etc. - And why do you not say, seeing you assume this ground, that in all cases we should do…
I. Here the apostle answers several objections, which might be made, to clear his way. No truth so plain and evident but…
And not rather, &c. The grammatical difficulty of this verse is great. The words, up to the brief last clause, are a…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture