“He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.”
My Notes
What Does 1 John 5:10 Mean?
John describes two opposite responses to God's testimony about his Son: he that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.
He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness (marturia — testimony, evidence, confirming proof) in himself — the believer carries internal confirmation. The witness is in himself — inside, personal, experiential. The testimony about the Son is not merely external (heard from others) but internal (confirmed within). The Holy Spirit within the believer provides the inner witness that the gospel is true (Romans 8:16: the Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit). The believing produces an internal knowing that is its own evidence.
He that believeth not God — the unbeliever's problem is not with a doctrine. It is with God himself. Believeth not God (apisteo to theo — to disbelieve God, to refuse to trust God). The object of the disbelief is God — not a theological system, not a church, not a human preacher. God. The rejection of the gospel is the rejection of God's own testimony.
Hath made him a liar (pseustes — a liar, one who speaks falsehood) — the consequence of unbelief is an implicit accusation: God is lying. If God testifies about his Son and you refuse to believe the testimony, you have called God a liar. The logic is inescapable: God says X about his Son. You say X is not true. Therefore you are calling God a liar. The unbelief is not neutral skepticism. It is the moral equivalent of accusing God of falsehood.
Because he believeth not the record (marturia — the testimony, the formal witness, the official declaration) that God gave of his Son — the specific content rejected: the record God gave. The record is God's testimony about Jesus — who he is, what he accomplished, what he provides. God gave this record. The unbeliever refuses it. And the refusal impugns the character of the one who gave it.
The verse creates a binary: believe and have the witness inside you — or disbelieve and call God a liar. There is no third option. The response to God's testimony about his Son is either internal confirmation or implicit accusation. The neutral position does not exist.
Reflection Questions
- 1.What is the 'witness in himself' that the believer possesses — and how does the internal confirmation differ from external evidence?
- 2.How does disbelief in God's testimony functionally 'make him a liar' — even without explicitly saying so?
- 3.What is 'the record that God gave of his Son' — and why is rejecting it a rejection of God himself, not just a doctrine?
- 4.Where are you holding God's testimony at arm's length rather than fully believing — and what does this verse say about that position?
Devotional
He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself. The believer has something the unbeliever does not: an internal witness. Not just external evidence. Internal confirmation — the Spirit-produced knowing that what you believe about the Son is true. The witness is in yourself — personal, experiential, undeniable to you even when unverifiable by others. The believing creates the knowing. And the knowing confirms the believing.
He that believeth not God hath made him a liar. The flip side. If you refuse to believe what God has testified about his Son, you have called God a liar. Not explicitly — you probably would not say 'God is a liar.' But functionally: God says his Son is the Savior. You say he is not. You have contradicted God. And contradicting God is calling him a liar — whether you use the word or not.
Because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son. The record — God's official testimony about Jesus. Who Jesus is. What Jesus did. What Jesus provides. God gave this testimony. He authorized it. He stands behind it. And the person who refuses to believe it is not merely disagreeing with a preacher or a church. They are rejecting the testimony that God himself gave.
The binary is absolute: believe and carry the witness inside you. Or disbelieve and make God a liar. There is no neutral position. You cannot say 'I am undecided about God's testimony.' Undecided is disbelieving — because the testimony has been given and the undecided person has not accepted it. The clock is running. The record is on the table. And your response to it is either trust or accusation.
Which side are you on? Do you have the witness in yourself — the internal confirmation that what God said about his Son is true? Or are you still holding God's testimony at arm's length — functionally calling him a liar while pretending you are just being careful? The record has been given. The response is binary. And the character of God is what is at stake in your response.
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
He that believeth on the Son of God,.... As a divine person who came in the flesh, and obeyed the law, and brought in…
He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself - The evidence that Jesus is the Son of God. Compare the…
He that believeth on the Son of God - This is God's witness to a truth, the most important and interesting to mankind.…
In those words we may observe,
I. The privilege and stability of the real Christian: He that believeth on the Son of…
He that believeth on the Son of God For the first time in this Epistle we have the full phrase -to believe on", of which…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture