Skip to content

2 Chronicles 19:2

2 Chronicles 19:2
And Jehu the son of Hanani the seer went out to meet him, and said to king Jehoshaphat, Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the LORD.

My Notes

What Does 2 Chronicles 19:2 Mean?

The seer Jehu confronts King Jehoshaphat after his alliance with wicked Ahab: and Jehu the son of Hanani the seer went out to meet him, and said to king Jehoshaphat, Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the LORD.

Jehu the son of Hanani the seer — a prophetic voice, continuing the ministry of his father Hanani (who rebuked Asa in 2 Chronicles 16:7-9). The seer (chozeh — one who sees visions, a prophetic observer) goes out to meet the king. The confrontation is initiated by the prophet, not requested by the king. The truth comes uninvited.

Shouldest thou help the ungodly — the question is rhetorical and accusatory. Should (ha — interrogative particle indicating the expected answer is no) you help (azar — to aid, to give military assistance) the ungodly (rasha — the wicked, those who are actively evil)? Jehoshaphat had just allied with Ahab — Israel's most wicked king — to fight at Ramoth-Gilead (2 Chronicles 18). The alliance nearly cost Jehoshaphat his life (18:31). The question asks: was that alliance appropriate?

And love (ahav — to be devoted to, to form affectionate alliance with) them that hate the LORD — the accusation deepens: Jehoshaphat loved those who hate God. The word love describes the alliance relationship — the political friendship, the covenant loyalty Jehoshaphat extended to a man whose defining characteristic was hatred of Yahweh. The alliance with Ahab was not neutral diplomacy. It was affection directed toward the enemies of God.

Therefore is wrath upon thee from before the LORD — the consequence: divine wrath (qetseph — fury, indignation). The wrath is from before the LORD (miliphne Yahweh — from the face of Yahweh). The wrath originates in God's presence and is directed at Jehoshaphat — not because Jehoshaphat was wicked himself but because he allied with the wicked. The association provoked the wrath.

The verse establishes a principle: alliance with God's enemies provokes God's anger — even when the ally is otherwise godly. Jehoshaphat was a reformer (17:3-6). He loved God. He removed the high places (partially). But his alliance with Ahab drew wrath because the alliance represented loyalty to someone who hated the LORD. The godly king's friendship with the ungodly king compromised the godly king's standing before God.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Why does alliance with the ungodly provoke God's wrath — even when the ally is otherwise godly?
  • 2.How does the word 'love' (describing political alliance) intensify the accusation beyond mere association?
  • 3.What does Jehoshaphat's story teach about the consequences of partnerships that compromise faithfulness — even for good leaders?
  • 4.What alliances in your life might be drawing you into the position Jehoshaphat occupied — and what would the prophet's question demand you change?

Devotional

Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD? The question is a rebuke disguised as a question. Jehoshaphat — a good king, a reformer, a man who sought God — had just allied himself with Ahab, the most wicked king in Israel's history. And the prophet says: should you? Should a king who loves God form a partnership with a king who hates him?

Help the ungodly. Jehoshaphat provided military assistance to Ahab — went to war alongside him, risked his own life in Ahab's battle. The help was tangible: soldiers, resources, personal presence on the battlefield. The alliance was not theoretical. It was costly — and it nearly killed Jehoshaphat (18:31).

Love them that hate the LORD. The word is love — not tolerate, not negotiate with. Love — the affectionate alliance, the political friendship, the bonding between two kings that expressed loyalty and devotion. And the object of Jehoshaphat's love was someone who hated the LORD. The alliance paired devotion to God's enemy with devotion to God — and God did not accept the pairing.

Therefore is wrath upon thee from before the LORD. Wrath. On Jehoshaphat. The good king. The reformer. The man who genuinely sought God. Wrath — because the alliance with God's enemy was a betrayal of God's friendship. You cannot love both God and the one who hates God. The friendship you extend to God's enemy is the friendship you withdraw from God.

Jehoshaphat was not wicked. He was compromised — a good man who formed a bad alliance and discovered that the alliance provoked the wrath his goodness should have prevented. The lesson: your personal godliness does not protect you from the consequences of your partnerships. Who you align with matters. Who you help matters. Who you love matters. And loving those who hate the LORD — however politically advantageous — draws wrath from the God who notices whom you chose as friends.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

And Jehu the son of Hanani the seer,.... The son of him that reproved Asa, for which he put him in prison, Ch2 17:7, but…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

Jehu ... went out to meet him - Compare 2Ch 15:2. The monarch was therefore rebuked at the earliest possible moment, and…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Jehu the son of Hanani - We have met with this prophet before; see the note on Kg1 16:7.

Therefore is wrath upon thee -…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–17142 Chronicles 19:1-4

Here is, I. The great favour God showed to Jehoshaphat,

1. In bringing him back in safety from his dangerous expedition…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

Jehu the son of Hanani He must have been an old man at this time for he had prophesied against Baasha (1Ki 16:1), since…