“But Naaman was wroth, and went away, and said, Behold, I thought, He will surely come out to me, and stand, and call on the name of the LORD his God, and strike his hand over the place, and recover the leper.”
My Notes
What Does 2 Kings 5:11 Mean?
"Naaman was wroth, and went away, and said, Behold, I thought, He will surely come out to me, and stand, and call on the name of the LORD his God, and strike his hand over the place, and recover the leper." Naaman is furious because the healing doesn't match his expectations: he imagined a dramatic scene with the prophet standing before him, waving his hand, invoking God's name, and curing the leprosy on the spot. Instead, Elisha doesn't even come to the door — he sends a messenger (verse 10) with instructions to wash in the Jordan seven times.
The phrase "I thought" (amarti — I said to myself) reveals preformed expectations: Naaman had already scripted the healing in his mind. The prophet comes out. The prophet stands before me. The prophet waves his hand. The prophet says dramatic words. The healing is visible, impressive, and immediate. None of this happened.
The anger isn't about whether the healing works. It's about whether the method matches the expectation. Naaman hasn't tried the Jordan yet. He's rejecting the prescription because it doesn't look like what he imagined healing should look like.
Reflection Questions
- 1.What 'I thought' expectation are you imposing on how God should work?
- 2.What simple instruction are you rejecting because it's not dramatic enough?
- 3.Why is the easy, humbling method harder to accept than the impressive, difficult one?
- 4.What servant's logic — 'if you'd do the hard thing, why not the easy one?' — could break through your pride?
Devotional
I thought he'd come out. I thought he'd stand before me. I thought he'd wave his hand. I thought there'd be drama. Instead: go wash in a muddy river. Seven times. Naaman is furious because the healing doesn't match the movie he'd already made in his head.
The 'I thought' is the problem: Naaman arrived with a pre-scripted healing sequence. The prophet emerges dramatically. The prophet performs an impressive gesture. The prophet invokes God with powerful words. The leprosy disappears visibly and immediately. The screenplay was complete before Naaman arrived. And the reality — a messenger at the door with instructions to bathe in a river — violated every scene.
The rejection of the method because it doesn't match the expectation is the most common spiritual failure: you reject the cure because it doesn't look like what you imagined. The healing is available. The prescription works. But the method is too simple, too undramatic, too humiliating. The Jordan instead of the Abana (verse 12). Washing instead of waving. Obedience instead of spectacle.
Naaman's servants save him (verse 13): 'if the prophet had bid thee do some great thing, wouldest thou not have done it?' You'd have obeyed an impressive command. Why not obey a simple one? The servant's logic is irresistible: if you'd do the hard thing, why won't you do the easy thing? The difficulty isn't the method. It's the pride.
What simple instruction are you rejecting because it doesn't match your 'I thought' expectation of how God should work?
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
But Naaman was wroth with him,.... On more accounts than one:
and went away; not to Jordan, but from the prophet's…
He will surely come out to me - In the East a code of unwritten laws prescribes exactly how visits are to be paid, and…
Naaman was wroth - And why? Because the prophet treated him without ceremony; and because he appointed him an…
We have here the cure of Naaman's leprosy.
I. The short and plain direction which the prophet gave him, with assurance…
But Naaman was wroth He had expected that his wish would have been accomplished at once, and that more display would…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture