“But Abner the son of Ner, captain of Saul's host, took Ishbosheth the son of Saul, and brought him over to Mahanaim;”
My Notes
What Does 2 Samuel 2:8 Mean?
While Judah crowns David, Abner — Saul's military commander — takes matters into his own hands by installing Saul's son Ishbosheth (also called Eshbaal) as king over the remaining tribes. This creates a rival monarchy and sets the stage for civil war.
Abner's motivations appear more political than loyal. He was Saul's cousin and military chief — his power depended on maintaining Saul's dynasty. By installing a puppet king (Ishbosheth is consistently portrayed as weak and dependent on Abner), Abner effectively becomes the power behind the throne.
The location — Mahanaim, east of the Jordan — reveals the weakness of this counter-kingdom. They can't even establish the capital in the heartland of Israel; they set up shop across the river, in the territory farthest from David's base in Hebron. Geography tells the story: this rival kingdom is already on the margins.
Reflection Questions
- 1.Where in your life are you resisting what God is clearly doing because the change threatens your position?
- 2.How do you distinguish between genuine loyalty and self-interest disguised as loyalty?
- 3.What 'puppet kings' have you installed to maintain control when God was moving in a new direction?
- 4.What does it cost — practically and spiritually — to prop up something God has decided to replace?
Devotional
Abner can't let go. Saul is dead, God has chosen David, and the old general installs a puppet king anyway because his own power depends on maintaining the old system. It's a portrait of what happens when personal interest masquerades as institutional loyalty.
Ishbosheth is barely a character in this story — he's a name Abner uses to legitimize his own authority. The real competition isn't between David and Ishbosheth; it's between God's choice and Abner's ambition. The rivalry will last seven years, cost many lives, and ultimately fail — because you can't successfully prop up what God has decided to replace.
This pattern recurs wherever power transitions happen. Someone with vested interests in the old regime creates an alternative rather than accepting the new reality. It looks like loyalty. It sounds like principle. But underneath, it's usually about preserving personal position.
When God is clearly moving in a new direction, clinging to the old structure isn't faithfulness — it's resistance. If Abner had recognized David's anointing and submitted, lives would have been saved and the kingdom would have unified sooner. But he couldn't release his grip on power. And it eventually cost him his life (2 Samuel 3:27).
What old structure are you propping up because letting go would cost you something?
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
But Abner, the son of Ner, captain of Saul's host,.... This man's father, Ner, was Saul's uncle, Sa1 14:50, and he was…
Mahanaim - See Gen 32:2. From 2Sa 2:12 it would seem to have been Ish-bosheth’s capital.
Abner the son of Ner - This man had long been one of the chief captains of Saul's army, and commander-in-chief on…
Here is, I. A rivalship between two kings - David, whom God made king, and Ishbosheth, whom Abner made king. One would…
Ish-bosheth set up by Abner as a rival to David
8. Abner Both by his relationship of first cousin to Saul (1Sa 14:50,…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture