Skip to content

Acts 24:15

Acts 24:15
And have hope toward God, which they themselves also allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust.

My Notes

What Does Acts 24:15 Mean?

Paul declares his hope — the hope he shares with his accusers — that there will be a resurrection of the dead, both just and unjust. Everyone rises. Not just the righteous. The unjust too. The resurrection isn't selective. It's universal. And the universal resurrection is the basis of the universal judgment.

The phrase "both of the just and unjust" means the resurrection isn't a reward for good behavior. It's a cosmic event that includes everyone. The just rise to reward. The unjust rise to judgment. But both rise. Death doesn't discriminate, and resurrection doesn't either. The grave gives everyone back.

"Which they themselves also allow" — Paul notes that his accusers share this belief. The Pharisees (most of his accusers) believed in resurrection. The common ground is the starting point: we agree on resurrection. We disagree on who has already been resurrected (Jesus). The shared doctrine becomes the contested application.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Does universal resurrection (just AND unjust) make death feel more or less final?
  • 2.How does 'both of the just and unjust' change the stakes of how you live?
  • 3.Does the shared belief (Paul and the Pharisees agreeing on resurrection) make the contested point (Jesus' resurrection) more pointed?
  • 4.Is the resurrection your hope (you're just) or your dread (you're unjust) — and can you change categories?

Devotional

There will be a resurrection. Of the just AND the unjust. Everyone comes back. And what happens after is what matters.

Paul states the hope that defines his life: resurrection. Not abstract afterlife. Physical, bodily, universal resurrection. The dead will rise. All of them. The righteous and the wicked. The faithful and the faithless. Everyone who has ever died will stand again.

"Both of the just and unjust" — the resurrection isn't a reward for the good. It's a universal event that includes the bad. The just rise to life (Daniel 12:2, John 5:29). The unjust rise to judgment (Daniel 12:2, John 5:29). But both rise. The grave isn't the final word for anyone. Not the saint. Not the sinner. Both come back.

This is either terrifying or comforting depending on which category you're in. For the just: the resurrection is the hope — the body that was buried will be raised. The loved one who died will live again. The injustice that wasn't corrected in this life will be corrected in the next. For the unjust: the resurrection is the reckoning — the death that seemed like escape wasn't. You come back. And you face what you ran from.

"Which they themselves also allow" — Paul finds common ground with his accusers: you believe in resurrection too. We agree on the doctrine. We disagree on the application. The Pharisees teach resurrection. Paul teaches resurrection — plus Jesus as the first one who did it. The shared belief becomes the contested evidence.

The resurrection of the dead — both just and unjust — is the foundation of all accountability. If death ends everything, nothing matters. If death is followed by resurrection — by standing before the God who judges with full knowledge — then everything matters. Every action. Every word. Every thought. Because you're coming back. And the coming back includes the accounting.

The hope of the just is resurrection. The dread of the unjust is the same resurrection. Same event. Different experience. Both guaranteed.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

And herein do I exercise myself,.... Or because of this; on account of this doctrine of the resurrection of the dead,…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

And have hope toward God - Having a hope of the resurrection of the dead, which arises from the promises of God. Which…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

And have hope toward God, etc. - I not only do not hold any thing by which the general creed of this people might be…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Acts 24:10-21

We have here Paul's defence of himself, in answer to Tertullus's charge, and there appears in it a great deal of the…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

and have(R. V.having) hope … which they themselves also allow (R. V.look for). Here the Apostle is of course alluding…