Skip to content

Acts 25:19

Acts 25:19
But had certain questions against him of their own superstition, and of one Jesus, which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

My Notes

What Does Acts 25:19 Mean?

Festus summarizes the case against Paul for King Agrippa with inadvertently perfect theology: the Jewish leaders' dispute with Paul was about "one Jesus, which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive." That's the entire gospel compressed into a governor's case summary. A dead man named Jesus whom Paul claims is alive. The resurrection, stated by a pagan bureaucrat, with no theological elaboration needed.

Festus calls the resurrection claim a matter of Jewish "superstition" (deisidaimonia, literally "fear of spirits" or "religious scruple")—categorizing the most important truth claim in human history as a minor religious disagreement. The Roman governor hears the gospel and files it under "internal Jewish religious disputes." The thing that changed the world registers as bureaucratic trivia.

The compression is powerful: "one Jesus, which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive" is arguably the most concise statement of the gospel in Acts. Not composed by a theologian or a preacher. Composed by a Roman bureaucrat who doesn't understand what he's saying. And yet the summary is theologically exact: Jesus. Dead. Affirmed to be alive. That's the gospel. The governor said it without knowing he said it.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Festus stated the gospel perfectly and dismissed it. Have you heard the gospel accurately without fully responding to its implications?
  • 2.The gospel compressed: 'Jesus was dead; Paul says He's alive.' Is that enough? Does your faith rest on those two facts?
  • 3.Festus categorized the resurrection as 'superstition.' How does the world around you categorize the same claim?
  • 4.The same facts produced bureaucratic indifference in Festus and world-changing mission in Paul. What determines your response to the same facts?

Devotional

Festus explains the case to Agrippa: it's about a dead man named Jesus whom Paul says is alive. That's it. The entire gospel in a sentence. Spoken by a pagan governor who thinks it's bureaucratic trivia. One Jesus. Dead. Paul says He's alive. Case summary complete.

The beautiful absurdity of this moment: the most important truth claim in human history—that a dead man is alive, that death has been defeated, that the resurrection is real—is summarized by a Roman administrator as a minor religious dispute. Festus heard the gospel, repeated it accurately, and dismissed it as superstition. He literally said the words that save and heard nothing in them.

The compression is perfect. You don't need a thousand pages of theology to communicate the gospel. You need what Festus said: Jesus was dead. Paul says He's alive. That's the claim. Everything else—the atonement, the kingdom, the new creation—flows from those two facts. Dead. Alive. If Jesus is alive, everything changes. If He's not, nothing does. The governor stated the issue with perfect precision while having zero understanding of its significance.

You have the same facts Festus had: one Jesus. Dead. Claimed to be alive. Festus heard them and filed them under "superstition." Paul heard them and changed the world. The facts don't change between the two responses. The response changes everything. The gospel is available to bureaucrats and apostles alike. What you do with it determines which category you end up in.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

But had certain questions against him of their own superstition,.... Or religion; as about their law, which they said…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

But had certain questions - Certain inquiries, or litigated and disputed subjects; certain points of dispute in which…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Questions - of their own superstition - Περι της ιδιας δειδιδαιμονιας; Questions concerning their own religion.…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Acts 25:13-27

We have here the preparation that was made for another hearing of Paul before King Agrippa, not in order to his giving…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

of their own superstition[R. V.religion]. The noun used here is cognate to the adjective employed by St Paul in speaking…