Skip to content

Amos 7:3

Amos 7:3
The LORD repented for this: It shall not be, saith the LORD.

My Notes

What Does Amos 7:3 Mean?

"The LORD repented for this: It shall not be, saith the LORD." After Amos intercedes against a vision of locust plague, God relents. "Repented" (nacham — to relent, to be grieved, to change one's mind about a planned action) describes a genuine divine response to prophetic intercession. God planned the locusts. Amos prayed. God relented. "It shall not be" reverses the decree — the judgment that was coming won't come.

The verse raises the profound theological question of divine changeability: does God change his mind? The text says yes — but in a specific way. God's character doesn't change. His response to human interaction does. Intercession produces relenting because God designed the system to work that way.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.What pending judgment in your world might be cancelled if someone interceded?
  • 2.How does God's relenting in response to prayer challenge the idea that everything is already decided?
  • 3.When have you been the Amos — publicly confronting sin while privately interceding for mercy?
  • 4.What does 'it shall not be' teach about the genuine power of intercessory prayer?

Devotional

It shall not be. Three words that cancel a divine decree. God planned a judgment. A prophet interceded. God relented. The locusts that were coming aren't coming. Because someone prayed.

The LORD repented. The word makes theologians uncomfortable because it seems to contradict divine immutability — the idea that God doesn't change. And God's character doesn't change. But his response to prayer does. He designed a system where intercession produces relenting. The prayer is the condition. The relenting is the response. And both are part of God's sovereign plan.

Amos sees the locust plague in a vision and prays: "O Lord GOD, forgive, I beseech thee: by whom shall Jacob arise? for he is small" (v. 2). The prayer appeals to Jacob's weakness, not to Jacob's worthiness. Israel is small. The plague would destroy them. And Amos — who has spent chapters condemning Israel's sin — prays for mercy anyway. The prophet who thunders judgment in public intercedes for mercy in private.

It shall not be. God says it himself. The planned judgment is cancelled. Not postponed. Cancelled. The locusts don't arrive. The fields are spared. The crops survive. Because a prophet stood in the gap between a righteous God and a sinful people and said: please don't.

This changes how you think about prayer. Prayer isn't just talking to a God who's already decided everything. Prayer is interacting with a God who has built genuine responsiveness into his system. "It shall not be" proves that some things that WOULD have been DON'T BE — because someone prayed. The judgment was real. The intercession was real. And the relenting was real. All three.

Somewhere right now, a judgment is pending that could be cancelled by prayer. Not every judgment (God told Jeremiah to stop praying in 14:11). But some. The question is: who will pray? And will God say: it shall not be?

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

The Lord repented for this,.... He heard the prayer of the prophet, and at his intercession averted, the threatened…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

The Lord repented for this - God is said to “repent, to have strong compassion upon” or “over” evil, which He has either…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

The Lord repented - Changed his purpose of destroying them by the locusts. See Amo 7:6.

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Amos 7:1-9

We here see that God bears long, but that he will not bear always, with a provoking people, both these God here showed…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

concerning this viz. concerning the further undefined calamity, which He had purposed, and of which Amos had rightly…