- Bible
- Deuteronomy
- Chapter 17
- Verse 6
“At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death.”
My Notes
What Does Deuteronomy 17:6 Mean?
"At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death." The minimum evidence standard for capital punishment is two witnesses. One witness is insufficient. The life-or-death decision requires corroboration. No single person's testimony can kill another person.
The principle protects against false accusation: if one person can condemn another to death, the system is vulnerable to personal vendettas, fabricated charges, and malicious prosecution. The two-witness requirement creates a structural safeguard: you need independent confirmation before executing someone.
Jesus references this principle (Matthew 18:16), and Paul applies it to church discipline (2 Corinthians 13:1, 1 Timothy 5:19). The two-witness standard extends from capital cases to every serious accusation. The protection against single-witness condemnation runs throughout Scripture.
Reflection Questions
- 1.Are you acting against someone based on a single witness or perspective?
- 2.Why does the most severe consequence require the most rigorous evidence?
- 3.How does the two-witness standard protect both the accused and the community?
- 4.Where in your life do you need to slow down and seek confirmation before acting?
Devotional
One witness isn't enough to kill someone. You need two. At minimum. The most severe consequence the legal system can impose — death — requires the most rigorous evidence standard: multiple, independent, corroborating testimony.
The single-witness prohibition is the Bible's most fundamental due-process protection: no individual can condemn another individual to death on their word alone. The system requires confirmation. Your accusation needs a second voice. Your testimony needs backup. One person's word, however convincing, is structurally insufficient for the ultimate penalty.
The protection runs in both directions: it protects the accused from false condemnation and it protects the community from acting on incomplete information. The two-witness standard slows the system down — which is precisely the point. Life-and-death decisions should be slow, deliberate, and multiply confirmed.
Jesus and Paul both extend this principle beyond capital cases: church discipline (Matthew 18:16), accusations against elders (1 Timothy 5:19), and personal confrontation (2 Corinthians 13:1) all invoke the two-witness standard. The protection that starts in Deuteronomy's courtroom extends to the New Testament's church.
Are you condemning someone on a single witness — a single perspective, a single report, a single version of events? The biblical standard says: not enough. Get confirmation before you act. One mouth isn't sufficient for the gravity of what you're considering.
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death,.... The idolater…
Compare Deu 13:1 ff. Here special reference is made to the legal forms to be adopted, Deu 17:5-7. The sentence was to be…
Here is, I. A law for preserving the honour of God's worship, by providing that no creature that had any blemish should…
At the mouth of two witnesses or at the mouth of three witnesses So Sam. and LXX, as in Deu 19:15, where the law, here…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture