Skip to content

Exodus 22:1

Exodus 22:1
If a man shall steal an ox, or a sheep, and kill it, or sell it; he shall restore five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep.

My Notes

What Does Exodus 22:1 Mean?

"If a man shall steal an ox, or a sheep, and kill it, or sell it; he shall restore five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep." The Law prescribes GRADUATED RESTITUTION for livestock-theft: steal an ox → restore FIVE. Steal a sheep → restore FOUR. The restitution is MULTIPLES, not equal-value: the thief pays BACK MORE than was taken. And the amounts DIFFER: five-for-one for an ox, four-for-one for a sheep. The graduation reflects the DIFFERENT VALUES and DIFFERENT IMPACTS of the theft.

The phrase "five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep" (chamishah vaqar yeshallem tachat hashshor ve'arba tzon tachat hasseh — five cattle he shall pay instead of the ox and four flock-animals instead of the sheep) prescribes DISPROPORTIONATE restitution: the thief doesn't just REPLACE what was stolen. The thief pays MULTIPLES — 5x for an ox, 4x for a sheep. The multiplication is PUNITIVE (the thief suffers financial loss for the crime) AND RESTORATIVE (the victim receives MORE than was lost). The restitution EXCEEDS the loss.

The DIFFERENT RATES (5x vs 4x) reflect DIFFERENT VALUES: an ox was MORE VALUABLE than a sheep — oxen pulled plows, transported goods, represented significant capital investment. The HIGHER restitution for the ox reflects the GREATER economic impact of its loss. The sheep, while valuable, was more easily REPLACED. The graduated penalty calibrates to the ECONOMIC HARM: the greater the harm, the greater the restitution.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.What does multiplied restitution teach about justice that exceeds mere replacement?
  • 2.How does the ox-rate being HIGHER than the sheep-rate model proportional justice?
  • 3.What does the victim receiving MORE than was lost teach about comprehensive restoration?
  • 4.What 'restitution' — what giving-back that exceeds the taking — does your situation require?

Devotional

Steal an ox — pay back FIVE. Steal a sheep — pay back FOUR. The restitution is MULTIPLIED: the thief returns MORE than was taken. The multiplication is both PUNITIVE (the thief suffers financial loss) and RESTORATIVE (the victim receives more than was stolen). And the rates DIFFER because the values differ: the ox-rate is higher because the ox-loss is greater.

The FIVE-for-ONE and FOUR-for-ONE rates are DISPROPORTIONATE restitution: biblical justice doesn't just REPLACE what was stolen. It MULTIPLIES — the thief pays back SEVERAL TIMES what was taken. The multiplication says: the crime cost you MORE than the value of the animal. The crime cost the victim peace of mind, security, trust, and economic stability. The multiple-restitution covers the FULL COST, not just the market price.

The DIFFERENT RATES (5 vs 4) reflect GRADUATED justice: the ox was the MORE VALUABLE animal — a work-animal that plowed fields, pulled carts, represented major capital. The sheep was valuable but MORE REPLACEABLE. The law CALIBRATES the restitution to the IMPACT: greater economic harm → higher restitution rate. Lesser economic harm → lower (but still multiplied) rate. The justice is PROPORTIONAL.

The 'kill it or sell it' covers BOTH dispositions of the stolen animal: whether the thief CONSUMED the animal (killed it) or PROFITED from it (sold it), the restitution is the SAME. The disposal method doesn't change the crime. The penalty addresses the THEFT, not the subsequent use. Eating the stolen or selling the stolen — the restitution is identical.

What does graduated, multiplied restitution teach about justice that EXCEEDS mere replacement?

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

If a man shall steal an ox or a sheep,.... In which the substance of men chiefly lay in those times, and particularly…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

The theft of an ox appears to have been regarded as a greater crime than the theft of a sheep, because it showed a…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

If a man shall steal - This chapter consists chiefly of judicial laws, as the preceding chapter does of political; and…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Exodus 22:1-6

Here are the laws,

I. Concerning theft, which are these: - 1. If a man steal any cattle (in which the wealth of those…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921Exodus 22:1-31

Exo 20:22 to Exo 23:33

The Book of the Covenant

The -Book of the Covenant" (see Exo 24:7 in explanation of the name) is…

Cross References

Related passages throughout Scripture