Skip to content

Exodus 23:4

Exodus 23:4
If thou meet thine enemy's ox or his ass going astray, thou shalt surely bring it back to him again.

My Notes

What Does Exodus 23:4 Mean?

"If thou meet thine enemy's ox or his ass going astray, thou shalt surely bring it back to him again." God commands the return of a wandering animal to its ENEMY. Not your friend's ox. Your enemy's. The law requires active assistance to the person you least want to help. The ox is wandering — it will be lost or stolen if nobody acts. And God says: you act. Even though the owner hates you and you hate the owner. Return the animal.

The command predates Jesus' "love your enemies" (Matthew 5:44) by fifteen hundred years. The ethic isn't a New Testament invention. The law of Moses required enemy-love in practical, tangible, livestock-returning terms long before the Sermon on the Mount articulated the principle abstractly.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.What 'ox' (opportunity to serve your enemy) has wandered across your path — and did you return it?
  • 2.How does the Old Testament command to return an enemy's ox predate and ground Jesus' 'love your enemies'?
  • 3.What does the emphasis (surely bring it back — absolutely, without question) teach about non-negotiable enemy-love?
  • 4.Where is an accidental encounter with your enemy's need the test of whether you'll practice the law of love?

Devotional

Your enemy's ox is lost. Bring it back. Not: let it wander and enjoy the revenge. Not: pretend you didn't see it. Bring it back. To your enemy. The person who hates you gets their animal returned by the person they hate.

If thou meet. The situation is accidental: you stumble upon the wandering animal. You didn't go looking for ways to serve your enemy. You just ran into the ox. The command addresses the moment of encounter: when the opportunity to serve your enemy appears unexpectedly, take it. Don't walk past. Don't look away. The meeting is the obligation.

Thine enemy's. Not just your neighbor's (though that's commanded too, v. 4-5). Your enemy's. The person whose hostility toward you is established and mutual. The person you'd be happiest to see lose an ox. THEIR ox. You return it.

Thou shalt surely bring it back. The doubling in Hebrew (hashev teshivennu — returning you shall return) is emphatic: absolutely, certainly, without question — return it. The obligation is non-negotiable. Your feelings about the owner don't factor into the law. The enemy-status doesn't create an exemption. The ox goes back.

The law transforms enemy encounters: instead of the natural instinct (let the enemy suffer loss), the law requires the countercultural action (prevent the enemy's loss). The enemy who loses an ox normally loses twice: the animal AND the satisfaction of being helped. God's law says: give the enemy the animal back AND the experience of being served by someone they didn't expect service from.

Jesus' 'love your enemies' didn't emerge from a vacuum. Moses' law already required it — in the most practical, tangible, livestock-shaped form. The ethic of enemy-love is as old as Sinai. What Jesus added was the explicit articulation of the principle behind the practice: love your enemies. What Moses provided was the practice behind the principle: return the ox.

The ox is the test: when your enemy's property is wandering and only you can return it, what do you do? The law says: bring it back. The principle says: love the person. The practice says: the ox is more important than the grudge.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

If thou meet thine enemy's ox or his ass going astray,.... Or any other beast, as the Samaritan version adds; for these…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870Exodus 23:4-5

So far was the spirit of the law from encouraging personal revenge that it would not allow a man to neglect an…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

If thou meet thine enemy's ox - going astray - From the humane and heavenly maxim in this and the following verse, our…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Exodus 23:1-9

Here are, I. Cautions concerning judicial proceedings; it was not enough that they had good laws, better than ever any…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921Exodus 23:4-5

An enemy'sbeast to be preserved from harm. These two injunctions breathe a spirit unusual in the OT. (cf., however, Lev…