Skip to content

Job 35:2

Job 35:2
Thinkest thou this to be right, that thou saidst, My righteousness is more than God's?

My Notes

What Does Job 35:2 Mean?

"Thinkest thou this to be right, that thou saidst, My righteousness is more than God's?" Elihu challenges what he perceives as Job's claim: that Job is more righteous than God. Job has repeatedly insisted on his innocence and accused God of injustice — which, in Elihu's framework, amounts to claiming moral superiority over God. If God is unjust and Job is innocent, then Job is more righteous than his judge.

Elihu's critique has some validity — Job's language has pushed the boundary of accusation. But Elihu misses the nuance: Job isn't claiming to be more righteous than God in an absolute sense. He's demanding that God be as righteous as Job believes God should be. His complaint is born from high expectations of God, not from self-exaltation.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.When you complain to God about injustice, is it from arrogance or from deep trust in who he should be?
  • 2.What's the difference between claiming to be more righteous than God and demanding God act righteously?
  • 3.How does Elihu's valid challenge miss the deeper reality of Job's complaint?
  • 4.When have you held God to his own standard — and was that faith or presumption?

Devotional

My righteousness is more than God's? Elihu hears this in Job's complaints and pushes back: do you really think that's right? Are you really claiming to be better than God?

Job never said it that bluntly. But his arguments have been circling the idea: I'm innocent. I'm suffering. God is allowing it. Therefore something is wrong with how God is operating. And if you follow that logic far enough, it implies that Job's moral standard exceeds God's — because Job wouldn't treat an innocent person this way.

Elihu's challenge is fair at the surface. Nobody is more righteous than God. But Job's actual complaint is more sophisticated than Elihu gives him credit for. Job isn't saying: I'm better than God. He's saying: God, be who I know you are. His complaint is born from trust, not arrogance. He believes God should be just — and he's holding God to God's own standard.

There's a difference between claiming to be more righteous than God and demanding that God be righteous. One is hubris. The other is the deepest form of faith — believing God's character so strongly that you confront God when his actions seem to contradict it. Job's protests come from belief, not unbelief. He's not saying God doesn't exist. He's saying God isn't acting like himself.

Elihu's question is still worth asking yourself: when you argue with God about injustice, are you claiming moral superiority, or are you calling God to be who he said he is? The answer determines whether your protest is arrogance or faith.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

For thou saidst, what advantage will it be unto thee?.... Meaning that his righteousness, his holy life and…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

Thinkest thou this to be right? - This is the point which Elihu now proposes to examine. He, therefore, solemnly appeals…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

My righteousness is more than God's? - This would indeed be a blasphemous saying; but Job never said so, neither…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Job 35:1-8

We have here,

I. The bad words which Elihu charges upon Job, Job 35:2, Job 35:3. To evince the badness of them he…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921Job 35:2-4

Statement of Job's charge against God that under His rule of the world to be righteous is no advantage to a man. The…