“Behold, he taketh away, who can hinder him? who will say unto him, What doest thou?”
My Notes
What Does Job 9:12 Mean?
Job confronts God's unquestionable sovereignty: "he taketh away, who can hinder him? who will say unto him, What doest thou?" Two rhetorical questions, both expecting the answer nobody. Nobody can stop God from taking. Nobody can demand an explanation. The sovereignty is absolute and the accountability is zero — from the human side.
The word "taketh away" (chathaph — to seize, to snatch, to carry off by force) describes God's action with violent vocabulary. Job doesn't use gentle language for what God does. He seizes. He snatches. The taking isn't gradual or negotiated. It's sudden and irresistible.
The question "what doest thou?" (mah ta'aseh) is the demand for accountability that nobody has standing to make. The created being cannot summon the Creator to explain himself. The clay cannot interrogate the potter. The challenge Job describes is the challenge he himself is making — and he knows it can't be answered.
Reflection Questions
- 1.How do you hold together the knowledge that God is unquestionable AND the need to question him?
- 2.What does Job's violent vocabulary ('snatches, seizes') reveal about how sovereignty feels from the receiving end?
- 3.Where have you asked 'what are you doing?' knowing you had no standing to demand an answer?
- 4.Is the futile questioning of God more honest than silent acceptance — and why?
Devotional
He takes. Nobody stops him. Nobody asks why. Job states the operating reality of divine sovereignty with the bluntness of someone who has just experienced it firsthand. Everything was taken. Nobody could prevent it. And the God who took it isn't answering questions.
The violence of the word — snatches, seizes — is deliberate. Job doesn't describe God gently removing blessings. He describes seizure. The children didn't quietly pass away. The wealth didn't gradually decline. Everything was snatched in a day. The violence of the experience produces violent vocabulary for the Taker.
The two questions are mirrors of each other: who can hinder? (nobody has the power to stop God) and who will say 'what are you doing?' (nobody has the standing to demand an explanation). Power and authority are both God's exclusively. You can't physically prevent what God does AND you can't verbally demand an account of why he does it. Both avenues are closed.
Job asks these questions knowing he's the one who wants to ask them. The challenge he says nobody can make is the challenge he's making throughout the book. The irony is self-aware: I know nobody can question God. I'm questioning God anyway. The acknowledgment of impossibility doesn't prevent the attempt.
This is the posture of honest suffering: you know God is sovereign. You know you can't demand answers. And you keep asking anyway. Because the alternative — silent acceptance of unexplained loss — is harder than the futile questioning. Job would rather ask questions he knows can't be answered than stop asking.
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
If God will not withdraw his anger,.... Or "God will not withdraw his anger" (m); he is angry, or at least seems to be…
Behold, he taketh away - Property, friends, or life. Who can hinder him? - Margin, turn him away. Or, rather, “who shall…
Bildad began with a rebuke to Job for talking so much, Job 8:2. Job makes no answer to that, though it would have been…
It is irresistible and irresponsible.
taketh away Carries off, as a beast of prey its booty.
who can hinder him Or, turn…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture