Skip to content

Joel 1:4

Joel 1:4
That which the palmerworm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the cankerworm eaten; and that which the cankerworm hath left hath the caterpiller eaten.

My Notes

What Does Joel 1:4 Mean?

Joel 1:4 describes devastation through accumulation — four waves of locusts, each finishing what the previous one started: "That which the palmerworm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the cankerworm eaten; and that which the cankerworm hath left hath the caterpiller eaten."

The four names — gazam (palmerworm), arbeh (locust), yeleq (cankerworm), chasil (caterpiller) — likely represent either four stages of the same locust's development or four successive swarms. Either way, the effect is cumulative annihilation. The first wave takes what it can. What it leaves, the second wave takes. What the second leaves, the third takes. What the third leaves, the fourth finishes. Nothing survives the sequence.

The literary structure is a chain — each clause begins with the residue of the previous one. The "left" — yeter — becomes the starting point for the next destruction. The remnant of one catastrophe becomes the raw material for the next. The progression is mechanical, systematic, and total. This isn't a single disaster. It's a cascading series of losses where each wave consumes what the previous wave spared. Joel uses this agricultural catastrophe (likely a real locust plague) as a metaphor for divine judgment — wave after wave, until nothing remains. The locusts don't negotiate. They don't leave mercy margins. They eat what's left until there's nothing left to leave.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Can you name the 'waves' in your life — the cascading losses where each one fed on what the previous one left?
  • 2.Where are you in the sequence — palmerworm, locust, cankerworm, or caterpiller stage — and does it feel like there's anything left?
  • 3.How does knowing Joel 2:25 promises restoration of 'the years the locust hath eaten' change how you hold your current devastation?
  • 4.What does compounded restoration look like for the specific things that were compoundedly taken from you?

Devotional

One wave wasn't enough. The palmerworm came and took what it could. Then the locust came for the leftovers. Then the cankerworm ate what the locust missed. Then the caterpiller cleaned the plate. Four waves. Each one consuming the remnant of the one before. Until there was nothing.

You might know this pattern. Not from actual locusts. From the cascading losses that don't arrive all at once but in sequence — each one feeding on what the previous one left behind. The job loss was the palmerworm. The health crisis that followed was the locust. The relationship strain that came from both was the cankerworm. And the spiritual depletion that resulted from carrying it all was the caterpiller, finishing off whatever was left.

Joel's locust plague is a picture of how accumulative devastation works. No single wave seems survivable, but the real damage is in the compounding. You survived the first loss. You could handle the second. But by the time the fourth wave arrives, it finds a field with nothing left to take — and takes the nothing anyway. That's where some people are: the caterpiller stage. Past the palmerworm. Past the locust. Past the cankerworm. Down to the bare branches.

But Joel's book doesn't end at verse 4. Chapter 2:25 promises: "I will restore to you the years that the locust hath eaten." The God who permitted the four waves has the authority to undo all four. The caterpiller took everything? God restores everything. Not gradually. The same God who allowed the compounding loss is the God who compounds the restoration. If you're at the bare branches, you're also at the starting point of the most dramatic restoration Joel will describe.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

That which the palmer worm hath left hath the locust eaten,.... These, with the two following, are four kinds of,…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

That which the palmerworm hath left, hath the locust eaten - The creatures here spoken of are different kinds of…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Joel 1:1-7

It is a foolish fancy which some of the Jews have, that this Joel the prophet was the same with that Joel who was the…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

The calamity to which the prophet has thus emphatically directed his hearers" attention: a visitation of locusts,…