Skip to content

Matthew 22:7

Matthew 22:7
But when the king heard thereof, he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city.

My Notes

What Does Matthew 22:7 Mean?

Matthew 22:7 is the most alarming verse in the Parable of the Wedding Feast — and it sits in the middle of what starts as a celebration. A king prepares a wedding for his son. He sends servants to call the invited guests. They refuse. He sends more servants. They ignore them, go to their farms and businesses, and — in a sudden escalation — seize, mistreat, and kill the messengers (v. 6).

"But when the king heard thereof, he was wroth" — orgistheis, furiously angry. The response is proportional to the offense: the invited guests didn't just decline a party. They murdered the king's servants. "He sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city" — the king's response is military, total, and permanent. The city — their city, their infrastructure, their entire way of life — is burned.

Most scholars see this as Jesus prophetically describing the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 — the Roman siege that leveled the city and destroyed the temple. The invited guests are Israel's leaders who rejected the invitation (the gospel) and killed the messengers (the prophets, and ultimately Christ Himself). The king's armies — Rome, in this reading — serve as instruments of divine judgment, much like Babylon served in the Old Testament.

The parable then pivots: the king sends servants to the highways to invite anyone they can find (vv. 8-10). The original guests forfeited their seats. The invitation goes to strangers. The feast continues — with different people at the table.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Are you guilty of indifference toward God's invitation — not outright rejection, but just being too busy?
  • 2.How does the parable's progression from ignoring to killing messengers challenge how you think about spiritual apathy?
  • 3.What does it mean that the feast continued with different guests after the original ones refused?
  • 4.Is there an invitation from God right now that you've been treating as optional?

Devotional

The king threw a feast. The invited guests killed the servants who brought the invitations. And the king burned their city.

Jesus tells this parable to the chief priests and Pharisees — people who would have understood immediately that they were the invited guests. They had the covenant. They had the promises. They had the first invitation. And their response to the wedding of the King's Son wasn't just indifference. It was violence against the messengers.

The escalation is terrifying because of how ordinary it starts. Some ignored the invitation and went to their farms. Some went to their businesses. Just... busy. Occupied. The wedding was there; they had other things to do. And then — almost without transition — some seized the servants, mistreated them, and killed them. Indifference and murder sit in the same verse, as if ignoring the invitation and attacking the messenger are on the same spectrum. And maybe they are. Maybe apathy toward God's invitation is just violence in slow motion.

The king's response — destroying the murderers and burning their city — is the cost of declining the feast. Not because the king is vindictive. Because the invitation was from a king, the feast was for his son, and treating that invitation with contempt — whether through murder or mere disinterest — has consequences that match the scale of what was offered.

The invitation is still open. The feast is still happening. But the table has been reset — and the people sitting at it aren't the original guests. They're the ones who came from the highways when the original invitees refused. The question isn't whether you'll be invited. It's whether you'll come.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

But when the king heard thereof,.... Of this maltreatment, and barbarous usage of his servants, their cries coming up…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

But when the king heard ... - This doubtless refers to the Jews and to Jerusalem. They were murderers, having slain the…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

he was wroth For a subject to scorn the summons to the royal feast implied disloyalty and rebellion.

sent forth his…