Skip to content

Matthew 27:23

Matthew 27:23
And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified.

My Notes

What Does Matthew 27:23 Mean?

"And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified." Pilate asks the crowd for evidence. They respond with volume. The governor who should adjudicate on evidence caves to the crowd that operates on rage. "What evil hath he done?" is the legal question. "Let him be crucified" is the mob answer. The two don't intersect: Pilate asks for a crime; the crowd demands an execution. Logic and fury talk past each other.

The phrase "cried out the more" (perissōs ekrazon — they screamed excessively, beyond measure) describes the escalation: the louder Pilate asks for reason, the louder the crowd screams for blood. Volume wins. Evidence loses. And the innocent man gets crucified.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Where have you seen evidence drowned by volume — the right question answered by louder demands?
  • 2.What does Pilate's correct question ('what evil?') followed by his capitulation teach about the limits of knowing what's right?
  • 3.When has a crowd's emotional intensity overridden your judgment about what's just?
  • 4.Where are you washing your hands — knowing something is wrong and doing it anyway because the pressure is too great?

Devotional

What evil has he done? The crowd's answer: CRUCIFY HIM. Louder this time. The governor asks for evidence. The mob provides decibels. And the decibels win.

Pilate's question is the last rational moment in the trial: what evil has he done? Name it. Specify the crime. Present the evidence. It's a legal question from a man trained in Roman law — a system that required specific charges and evidence before execution. What evil?

The crowd doesn't answer the question. They can't. There's no evil to name. Instead, they scream louder. The response to the request for evidence is an increase in volume. As if shouting "crucify" with enough intensity substitutes for presenting a case. As if passion replaces proof.

Cried out the more. More than before. The escalation is the strategy: when logic fails, escalate the emotion. When the evidence isn't there, increase the volume. When the governor hesitates, scream until hesitation becomes compliance. The mob doesn't need to be right. It needs to be loud.

This is how injustice often works: the evidence asks one question and the crowd answers another. The system designed for adjudication is overwhelmed by the system designed for intimidation. Pilate has the authority. The crowd has the noise. And the noise overpowers the authority — not because it's more legitimate but because it's more relentless.

Pilate washes his hands (v. 24). The gesture that says: I know this is wrong and I'm doing it anyway. The governor who asked the right question couldn't withstand the crowd that gave the wrong answer at the right volume.

Every time evidence is drowned by volume — every time the question 'what evil has been done?' is answered by louder demands for punishment — Pilate's courtyard is replaying. And the innocent person gets crucified because the crowd was louder than the law.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

When Pilate saw he could prevail nothing,.... That it was to no purpose to talk to them, and in favour of Jesus; he saw…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870Matthew 27:15-23

See also the parallel places in Mar 15:6-14; Luk 23:17-23; Joh 18:39-40. Mat 27:15 At that feast - The feast of the…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921Matthew 27:11-26

The Trial before Pontius Pilate

St Mar 15:2-15; St Luk 23:2-7; Luk 23:13-24; St Joh 18:29 to Joh 19:16

St Luke states…