Skip to content

Micah 3:1

Micah 3:1
And I said, Hear, I pray you, O heads of Jacob, and ye princes of the house of Israel; Is it not for you to know judgment?

My Notes

What Does Micah 3:1 Mean?

Micah confronts the leaders of Israel with a pointed question: is it not for you to know judgment? The leaders whose primary job is justice are the ones most ignorant of it. The people responsible for right judgment are the ones most removed from it.

The accusation is not that they lack intelligence. It is that they have abandoned their core responsibility. The heads and princes were appointed to administer justice. Instead, they have become the perpetrators of injustice (v.2-3).

The question format is intentional: Micah does not lecture. He asks. The question assumes the answer is obvious — of course leaders should know judgment. The fact that the question needs asking is itself the indictment.

The verses that follow (v.2-3) describe the leaders' behavior in grotesque terms: they hate good and love evil, they strip the flesh from the bones of the people. The leaders who should protect the vulnerable are devouring them.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.How does the question format — 'is it not for you?' — function as an indictment?
  • 2.What does leaders hating good and loving evil describe about moral inversion?
  • 3.Where does your position of responsibility demand a knowledge of justice that you have neglected?
  • 4.How do the leaders becoming predators of the people they should protect describe systemic corruption?

Devotional

Is it not for you to know judgment? The question lands like a slap. The leaders — the heads of Jacob, the princes of Israel — should know justice better than anyone. It is their job. Their calling. Their primary responsibility.

And they do not know it. The people appointed to uphold justice are the ones most ignorant of it. The irony is the indictment.

Who hate the good, and love the evil (v.2). The inversion is complete: they hate what they should love and love what they should hate. The moral compass is not just broken. It is reversed.

The leaders who should protect the people are described as predators (v.2-3) — tearing flesh, breaking bones, consuming the vulnerable. The shepherd has become the wolf. The protector has become the predator.

Micah's question applies to every person in a position of responsibility: is it not for you to know what is right? If you have authority over others — in a family, a workplace, a church, a community — the knowledge of justice is your primary obligation.

The leaders Micah confronted knew plenty of things. They knew politics. They knew power. They knew how to profit. What they did not know — what they had abandoned — was judgment. The one thing their position demanded is the one thing they refused to practice.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

And I said, hear, I pray you, O heads of Jacob, and ye princes of the house of Israel,.... This seems to be a new sermon…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

And I said - God’s love for us is the great incitement, constrainer, vivifier of His creature’s love. Micah had just…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Hear - O heads of Jacob - The metaphor of the flock is still carried on. The chiefs of Jacob, and the princes of Israel,…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Micah 3:1-7

Princes and prophets, when they faithfully discharge the duty of their office, are to be highly honoured above other…