Skip to content

Numbers 11:21

Numbers 11:21
And Moses said, The people, among whom I am, are six hundred thousand footmen; and thou hast said, I will give them flesh, that they may eat a whole month.

My Notes

What Does Numbers 11:21 Mean?

"And Moses said, The people, among whom I am, are six hundred thousand footmen; and thou hast said, I will give them flesh, that they may eat a whole month." Moses questions God's promise to provide meat for the entire nation for a month. Six hundred thousand men (plus women and children — potentially two million people total). For thirty days. Moses calculates the logistics and they don't work: shall flocks and herds be slain? Shall all the fish of the sea be gathered? (v. 22). The math is impossible. The provision exceeds every available resource.

God's response (v. 23): "Is the LORD's hand waxed short?" Has my power diminished? The question is rhetorical: the God who fed them manna daily can certainly provide meat monthly. Moses' mistake isn't doubting God's willingness. It's calculating God's capacity using natural resources.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.What impossible calculation are you running based on natural resources that ignores divine capacity?
  • 2.How does 'Is the LORD's hand waxed short?' reframe the logistics problem you're currently facing?
  • 3.Where has God's provision exceeded (even embarrassingly exceeded) what you calculated was possible?
  • 4.What does Moses questioning the feasibility of God's own promise teach about the gap between faith and calculation?

Devotional

Six hundred thousand men. Meat for a month. Moses does the math and it doesn't work. The promise exceeds every resource calculation available. And God says: is my hand too short?

The people, among whom I am, are six hundred thousand footmen. Moses states the problem as a logistics equation: this many people × this many days = an impossible amount of meat. The calculation is correct. The conclusion (therefore it can't be done) is wrong. Because the calculation only accounts for natural resources — flocks, herds, fish. It doesn't account for supernatural provision.

Thou hast said, I will give them flesh. God made the promise. Moses questions the feasibility. The promise and the doubt coexist in the same conversation. God says: I'll do it. Moses says: but how? The how is Moses' problem, not God's. God didn't ask Moses to figure out the logistics. He asked Moses to trust the promise.

Shall the flocks and the herds be slain for them, to suffice them? (v. 22). Moses calculates: if we slaughter ALL the livestock, would it be enough for a month? The answer he expects: no. The calculation reveals his framework: natural resources are the supply. And natural resources are insufficient for the demand. Therefore the promise can't be fulfilled.

Is the LORD's hand waxed short? (v. 23). God's response is a question that reframes everything: has my capacity decreased? Have my resources diminished? Has the hand that created matter, that split the sea, that rained manna from heaven — has that hand gotten shorter? The answer: no. And if the hand is the same length, the calculation based on natural resources is irrelevant.

God sends quail — enough to cover the ground three feet deep for a day's journey in every direction (v. 31). The provision exceeds even what the people could collect. The math that Moses said didn't work produced a surplus so massive it became a judgment (v. 33-34: the quail came with a plague). The provision that seemed impossible turned out to be excessive. Because the hand isn't short.

Your version of Moses' calculation: this many bills × this much income = impossible. This much need × this many resources = insufficient. This big a problem × this small a capacity = failure. And God's response is the same: is my hand waxed short? Has my capacity decreased since the last time I provided? The calculation based on natural resources is always insufficient. The calculation based on divine capacity is always surplus.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

And Moses said,.... By way of objection to what God had promised, distrusting his power to perform:

the people amongst…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870Numbers 11:4-35

Occurrences at Kibroth-hattavah. Num 11:4 The mixt multitude - The word in the original resembles our “riff-raff,” and…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Numbers 11:16-23

We have here God's gracious answer to both the foregoing complaints, wherein his goodness takes occasion from man's…

Cross References

Related passages throughout Scripture