Skip to content

Romans 11:17

Romans 11:17
And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;

My Notes

What Does Romans 11:17 Mean?

Romans 11:17 introduces Paul's olive tree metaphor — one of the most important images for understanding the relationship between Israel and the Gentile church. "If some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree."

The Greek agrielaios (wild olive) describes the Gentile believers: uncultivated, undomesticated, growing wild without the covenant, the promises, or the heritage. The cultivated olive tree is Israel — rooted in Abraham, nourished by the covenant promises, tended by God for millennia. Some branches (unbelieving Israel) were broken off (exeklasthēsan). And wild branches (Gentile believers) were grafted in (enekentristhēs) — surgically inserted into the cultivated tree to share its root and richness.

The phrase "partakest of the root and fatness" (sunkoinōnos tēs rizēs kai tēs piotētos) means the Gentile believer draws life from Israel's root — Abraham, the patriarchs, the covenant. The wild olive doesn't bring its own root system. It receives nourishment from the root it was grafted into. Paul's point (developed through verse 24) is both humbling and clarifying: Gentile believers are guests in Israel's tree, not the other way around. The root supports the branches. The branches don't support the root. Every Gentile believer's spiritual life is nourished by a Jewish root.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.You were a wild olive grafted into a cultivated tree. How does knowing your faith is rooted in Israel's covenant — not your own heritage — shape your gratitude and humility?
  • 2.Paul warns against arrogance toward the broken-off branches. Where do you see Christians treating Judaism or the Jewish people with superiority rather than gratitude?
  • 3.The root supports you — you don't support the root. Where has your spiritual confidence been misplaced in your own contribution rather than in the root that nourishes you?
  • 4.Gentile believers are guests in Israel's tree. How does this reframe your understanding of the Old Testament — as your story or as someone else's story you were invited into?

Devotional

You were a wild olive branch. Uncultivated. Growing without covenant, without promises, without the heritage of Abraham. And God cut you from the wild and grafted you into the cultivated tree — Israel's tree. The root that feeds you is Abraham's root. The richness you enjoy is the covenant's richness. You didn't bring your own nourishment. You were given access to someone else's.

Paul writes this to Gentile Christians who were apparently becoming arrogant toward Jewish non-believers (verse 18: "Boast not against the branches"). The wild olive was starting to feel superior to the cultivated branches that were broken off. And Paul says: stop. You don't support the root. The root supports you. Everything you have in Christ — every promise, every covenant blessing, every spiritual inheritance — flows through a Jewish root system. You were grafted in. You're a guest in someone else's tree. The arrogance of a grafted branch toward the original branches is the most absurd kind of pride: you're bragging about a richness you didn't produce.

If you're a Gentile believer, this verse defines your relationship to Judaism and to Israel's story: you are a beneficiary, not a replacement. The church didn't replace Israel. It was grafted into Israel's tree. The root is Jewish. The promises are Jewish. The Messiah is Jewish. And the richness that feeds your faith — every covenant, every psalm, every prophetic promise — came through a tree that was growing for thousands of years before your wild branch was cut and inserted. Gratitude, not arrogance, is the appropriate posture of a branch that was grafted in.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

And if some of the branches be broken,.... This is to be understood, not of the exclusion of the Jews from their…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

If some of the branches - The illustration here is taken from the practice of those who ingraft trees. The useless…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

And if some of the branches, etc. - If the present nation of the Jews, because of their unbelief, are cut off from the…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Romans 11:1-32

The apostle proposes here a plausible objection, which might be urged against the divine conduct in casting off the…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

some of the branches A tenderstatement of what, alas, was so great an amount of unbelief. See below again, Rom 11:25;…