Skip to content

Romans 9:11

Romans 9:11
(For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;)

My Notes

What Does Romans 9:11 Mean?

Romans 9:11 is one of the most theologically concentrated verses in Scripture. Paul is explaining God's choice of Jacob over Esau, and he inserts this parenthetical to eliminate every possible basis for the choice except one: God's sovereign purpose. The children weren't born yet. They hadn't done anything good or evil. The selection happened before action, before character, before any conceivable human merit.

The Greek prothesis (purpose) refers to God's predetermined plan — His settled intention that existed before the objects of that intention existed. "According to election" (kat' eklogen) — the choice was God's, initiated by God, serving God's purposes. "Not of works" (ouk ex ergon) eliminates human performance as a factor. "But of him that calleth" (ek tou kalountos) locates the entire basis of the choice in God's calling. The calling isn't a response to human potential. It's a sovereign act that creates the potential.

Paul's point is not to resolve the philosophical tension between divine sovereignty and human freedom — he doesn't try. His point is to establish that God's saving purposes have never been based on human performance. From the beginning — before birth, before action, before any possibility of earning or losing favor — God chose. This isn't fatalism. It's the demolition of the idea that your standing before God depends on your achievement. Election means God decided before you could do anything, which means nothing you've done can undo it.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.God chose before the children were born or had done anything. Does that comfort you or trouble you? What does your reaction reveal about where you place your confidence?
  • 2.Paul eliminates works as the basis for God's choice. Where are you still unconsciously believing that your standing with God depends on your performance?
  • 3.This verse doesn't resolve the tension between sovereignty and free will. How comfortable are you with theological tension that doesn't resolve neatly?
  • 4.If election means God decided before you could do anything, then nothing you've done can undo it. How does that reframe your worst failure?

Devotional

Before they were born. Before they'd done anything good or bad. Before there was any resume to evaluate or track record to assess. God chose. That's the point Paul is making, and he strips away every alternative explanation until only one remains: the purpose of God according to election.

This verse is one of those passages that either offends you or frees you, depending on what you're carrying. If you're carrying the weight of performance — the belief that God's favor depends on your output — this verse takes a sledgehammer to the foundation of that lie. God chose Jacob before Jacob did anything. The choice wasn't a reward. It was a decision made in the complete absence of human merit. Your standing with God was never about your performance. It was about His purpose.

If the verse offends you — if the idea of God choosing before anyone acts feels unfair — Paul anticipates that reaction (verse 14: "Is there unrighteousness with God?") and answers it. But notice what he doesn't do: he doesn't resolve the tension neatly. He doesn't give you a chart that makes divine sovereignty and human responsibility fit together in a clean equation. He lets the tension stand, because the point isn't to satisfy your philosophical need for resolution. The point is to relocate your confidence from your works to God's calling. And if your confidence is in the One who calls rather than in the one who performs, you'll never run out of ground to stand on.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

It was said unto her,.... To Rebecca, Gen 25:23,

the elder shall serve the younger, or "the greater shall serve the…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

For the children being not yet born - It was not, therefore, by any works of theirs. It was not because they had formed…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

For the children being not yet born - As the word children is not in the text, the word nations would be more proper;…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Romans 9:6-13

The apostle, having made his way to that which he had to say, concerning the rejection of the body of his countrymen,…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

being not yet born, &c. Nothing could go beyond this verse in stating that the reasonsof the Divine Choice lie wholly…