“And Naomi said, Turn again, my daughters: why will ye go with me? are there yet any more sons in my womb, that they may be your husbands?”
My Notes
What Does Ruth 1:11 Mean?
"Turn again, my daughters: why will ye go with me? are there yet any more sons in my womb, that they may be your husbands?" Naomi releases her daughters-in-law with brutal honesty: I have nothing to offer you. No more sons. No more hope. No more reason to stay. The argument is biological and economic: the levirate marriage system (a dead husband's brother marrying the widow) requires brothers who don't exist. Naomi's womb is empty. Her future is empty. And she says so.
The rhetorical question — "are there yet any more sons in my womb?" — is a woman's most painful self-assessment: my body cannot produce what you need. The capacity to help is gone. The resource you need — a husband — comes from a source that's been permanently exhausted.
Naomi's release of Ruth and Orpah is an act of love disguised as an act of despair: she wants them to have futures even if she can't provide them. The sending away is the most generous thing Naomi can do — give them back the years her empty womb can't fill.
Reflection Questions
- 1.When logic says leave and someone you love tells you to go — what makes you stay?
- 2.What does Naomi's honest self-assessment teach about love through releasing?
- 3.Is Orpah's reasonable departure condemned — or is it simply contrasted with Ruth's extraordinary commitment?
- 4.What hopeless situation are you staying in that might produce an extraordinary outcome?
Devotional
Go back. I have nothing for you. No more sons. No more future. No more hope in my body. Naomi looks at her daughters-in-law and says the hardest truth she knows: I can't help you. My womb is done. Your best chance is somewhere else.
The honesty is devastating because it's accurate: Naomi has no sons to offer. The levirate system that could have provided new husbands requires brothers that don't exist. Even if Naomi could conceive (verse 12-13 — she considers the hypothetical), the waiting would be absurd. The situation is genuinely hopeless by every available calculation.
The sending-away is love: Naomi loves these women enough to release them. She could have kept them — for companionship, for care in old age, for the comfort of not being alone. Instead, she gives them their freedom. Go back to your mothers' houses (verse 8). Find new husbands. Have the lives I can't give you. The generosity is in the releasing.
Orpah goes. She kisses Naomi and returns to Moab (verse 14). The text doesn't condemn her. The departure is reasonable. Naomi told her to go. She went. The reasonable response to 'I have nothing for you' is to find someone who does.
Ruth stays. And Ruth's staying — in the face of logic, in the face of Naomi's insistence, in the face of every rational calculation — becomes one of the most famous commitments in Scripture (verse 16-17). The reasonable daughter-in-law left. The unreasonable one stayed. And the unreasonable one changed history.
When logic says leave, what makes you stay?
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
And Naomi said, turn again, my daughters,.... Supposing this resolution of theirs only arose from a natural affection,…
See marginal references and notes. The Levirate law probably existed among the Moabites, and in Israel extended beyond…
Are there yet any more sons - This was spoken in allusion to the custom, that when a married brother died without…
See here, I. The good affection Naomi bore to the land of Israel, Rut 1:6. Though she could not stay in it while the…
have I yet sons … that they may be your husbands?] Alluding to the custom of levirate marriage, i. e. marriage with a…