Skip to content

Amos 1:9

Amos 1:9
Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Tyrus, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they delivered up the whole captivity to Edom, and remembered not the brotherly covenant:

My Notes

What Does Amos 1:9 Mean?

"Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Tyrus, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they delivered up the whole captivity to Edom, and remembered not the brotherly covenant." Amos turns God's judgment toward Tyre — the great Phoenician trading city — and the charge is betrayal of a specific relationship.

"For three transgressions... and for four" — this formula runs through Amos 1-2, applied to nation after nation. The pattern means: the sins have accumulated past the point of patience. Three was enough. The fourth sealed it. The cup is full.

"They delivered up the whole captivity to Edom" — Tyre captured people — likely Israelite refugees or prisoners — and handed them over to Edom, Israel's bitter enemy descended from Esau. Tyre didn't just ignore Israel's suffering. They actively participated in it by transferring captives to the nation most hostile to them. They sold people to their enemies.

"Remembered not the brotherly covenant" — this is the indictment's heart. Tyre and Israel had a covenant relationship. Hiram of Tyre and Solomon were allies. They called each other "brother" (1 Kings 9:13). The covenant of brotherhood meant mutual obligation — you protect each other, you don't exploit each other, you don't sell each other's people.

Tyre forgot. Not passively — the Hebrew for "remembered not" (zakar lo) implies a deliberate setting aside. They chose profit over loyalty. They had a treaty. They had a relationship. They had the word "brother" on the document. And they sold their brother's people to their brother's enemy. For God, that's enough. The punishment stands.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Has someone who should have been a 'brother' delivered you to your enemies? How do you hold that betrayal alongside God's promise of justice?
  • 2.Tyre 'remembered not the brotherly covenant.' Is there a covenant — a friendship, a promise, a commitment — that you've quietly abandoned for convenience?
  • 3.God judges relational betrayal, not just theological error. How seriously do you take your covenants with people compared to your covenant with God?
  • 4.The formula 'for three transgressions and for four' suggests accumulated guilt. What happens when trust violations stack up without being addressed?

Devotional

Tyre's sin wasn't that they worshipped the wrong God. It was that they betrayed the right relationship. They had a covenant — a brotherly agreement — and they violated it for profit. They took people who trusted the alliance and delivered them to the enemy.

God judges this. Not just idolatry. Not just theological error. Relational treachery. The violation of a covenant between peoples. When you had an agreement with someone, when you called each other brother, and you sold them out — God takes that personally. It's one of the four transgressions that fills the cup.

This speaks to anyone who has been betrayed by someone who was supposed to be a brother. A friend who turned on you. A partner who sold you out. A community that had a covenant with you and delivered you to the enemy when it became convenient. God saw it. It's on the list. And the punishment will not be turned away.

But it also speaks to you if you're the one who forgot the covenant. If there's someone you were bound to — by friendship, by promise, by shared history — and you chose profit or convenience over loyalty. If you delivered someone to their enemy because it benefited you. Tyre "remembered not." That's a choice. Forgetting a covenant isn't passive memory failure. It's the active decision that the relationship no longer serves you.

God has a long memory about covenants. He remembers the ones you've forgotten. And He holds both parties accountable — the one who honored it and the one who didn't.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

Thus saith the Lord, for three transgressions of Tyrus,.... Or Tyre, a very ancient city in Palestine; of which See Gill…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

The last crowning sin, for which judgment is pronounced on Tyre, is the same as that of Philistia, and probably was…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Tyrus - See an ample description of this place, and of its desolation and final ruin, in the notes on Ezekiel 26-28…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Amos 1:3-15

What the Lord says here may be explained by what he says Jer 12:14, Thus said the Lord, against all my evil neighbours…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921Amos 1:9-10

Tyre, the great commercial city of the North, next receives her doom from the prophet's lips. Tyre, as the most…