Skip to content

John 10:31

John 10:31
Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.

My Notes

What Does John 10:31 Mean?

"Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him." The word AGAIN (palin) carries the weight of this verse: they took up stones AGAIN. This isn't the first time. The stoning attempt is REPEATED — a recurring response to Jesus' claims. The stones were picked up before (8:59). They're picked up AGAIN now. The violence has become the DEFAULT RESPONSE to Jesus' self-revelation. The greater the claim, the bigger the stones.

The phrase "took up stones" (ebastasan lithous — they carried/picked up stones) describes DELIBERATE preparation for violence: the stones didn't appear in their hands. They PICKED THEM UP — bent down, selected, lifted, prepared to throw. The stoning is not impulsive. It's PREPARED. The bending and lifting are physical acts of premeditation. The hands that should be raised in worship are picking up weapons.

The "again" (palin) reveals the PATTERN: the stoning response is HABITUAL. Jesus speaks. They stone. Jesus claims. They throw. The 'again' says: this happened BEFORE and it's happening AGAIN. The violence is cyclical. The rejection is patterned. The stones are the consistent answer to the inconvenient claims.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.What truth produces the 'again' response — repeated rejection every time you speak?
  • 2.What does the stoning being HABITUAL (again) teach about patterned rejection of truth?
  • 3.How does the physical act of picking up stones (bending, selecting, lifting) describe premeditated violence?
  • 4.What claim of Jesus' are you picking up stones against — and do you understand what you're rejecting?

Devotional

They picked up stones. AGAIN. The word 'again' tells you everything: this isn't new. The stoning response is a PATTERN. Jesus speaks divine truth. They grab rocks. The cycle is established. The violence is the default. The stones are the consistent response to claims the leaders can't handle.

The 'took up stones' is PHYSICAL premeditation: the stones don't appear in their hands. They BEND DOWN. They SELECT. They LIFT. They PREPARE to throw. Each physical action is a decision — the bending is the deciding, the selecting is the choosing, the lifting is the committing. The stoning attempt is built one physical action at a time. The violence is assembled step by step.

The 'again' makes the violence CYCLICAL: this happened at 8:59 and it's happening again at 10:31. The pattern is: Jesus makes a claim → the leaders respond with stones. The claims escalate (8:58 — 'before Abraham was, I am'; 10:30 — 'I and my Father are one'). The stone-responses escalate with them. The greater the claim, the faster the stones are picked up. The 'again' says: the rejection is a loop.

The TRIGGER this time (verse 30 — 'I and my Father are one') is the most direct claim to DIVINITY Jesus has made: the oneness with the Father is the statement the stones respond to. The Jewish leaders understand the claim PERFECTLY (verse 33 — 'for a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy'). The comprehension is accurate. The response is violent. They understand EXACTLY what Jesus is claiming. And they pick up stones.

What truth has produced the 'again' response in your life — the repeated rejection, the cyclical violence, the stones picked up every time you speak?

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him. As they had done before; see Gill on Joh 8:59;

;

John 10:32

joh…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

The Jews took up stones - Stoning was the punishment of a blasphemer, Lev 24:14-16. They considered him guilty of…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

The Jews took up stones - To stone him as a blasphemer, Lev 24:14-16, because he said he was one with God. The…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714John 10:22-38

We have here another rencounter between Christ and the Jews in the temple, in which it is hard to say which is more…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

Then the Jews Better, Therefore the Jews:their picking up stones was a direct consequence of His words. But -therefore"…