Skip to content

Romans 2:17

Romans 2:17
Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God,

My Notes

What Does Romans 2:17 Mean?

Romans 2:17 begins Paul's direct address to the Jewish person who assumes their spiritual credentials exempt them from the judgment Paul has been describing — and the address is a surgical dismantling of religious privilege. "Behold, thou art called a Jew" — ide su Ioudaios eponomazē. You bear the name — eponomazō, you're called, you're identified, you carry the label. The name Jew (Ioudaios) carried enormous spiritual prestige: covenant people, chosen nation, recipients of God's revelation.

"And restest in the law" — kai epanapauē nomō. Epanapauō — to rest upon, to lean against, to find security in. The law (nomos — the Torah, the complete Mosaic revelation) had become a pillow. Not a guide for living but a cushion for confidence. The Jew Paul describes doesn't just follow the law. He rests in it — leans his spiritual weight on it as if possession of the law were the same as obedience to the law.

"And makest thy boast of God" — kai kauchasai en theō. Kauchaomai — to boast, to glory, to take pride. En theō — in God. They boast in their special relationship with God — not inappropriately (Romans 5:11 commends boasting in God through Christ), but as a credential that exempts them from accountability. The boasting has become the substitute for the living.

Verses 18-24 extend the indictment: you know His will, you approve what's excellent, you instruct the foolish, you teach babes — and then verse 21: "Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself?" The privilege became the shield behind which the failure hid. The name, the law, and the God-boasting were all real. And none of them produced the righteousness they assumed they guaranteed.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.What spiritual credentials are you 'resting in' instead of living by?
  • 2.Where has your knowledge of God's word become a couch rather than a path?
  • 3.Do you boast in God as a relationship that transforms you or as a credential that exempts you?
  • 4.If Paul asked you 'thou that teachest another, teachest thou not thyself?' — what would the honest answer be?

Devotional

You carry the right name. You lean on the right book. You boast in the right God. And none of it has changed you.

Paul's address to the self-satisfied Jewish believer is the most uncomfortable mirror in Romans. Every credential listed is genuine: the name Jew, the law of Moses, the relationship with the God of Abraham. These aren't fake. They're the most valuable spiritual assets in the ancient world. And Paul says: you're resting in them instead of living by them.

"Restest in the law." The law was given as a path. The Jew Paul describes turned it into a couch. The Torah that was supposed to produce obedience became the source of complacency. I have the law. Therefore I'm fine. The possession replaced the practice. The owning replaced the obeying.

"Makest thy boast of God." Boasting in God isn't wrong — Paul does it himself (Romans 5:11). But boasting in God as a credential — as if your special relationship exempts you from the accountability that applies to everyone else — is the most dangerous form of spiritual pride. You boast in God while your life doesn't reflect God. You claim the relationship while living as if it carries no obligations.

The devastating pivot comes in verse 21: you teach others — do you teach yourself? You preach against stealing — do you steal? Against adultery — do you commit it? Against idols — do you frequent their temples? The teacher who doesn't practice what they teach is worse than the untaught person who sins in ignorance. Because the teacher had the knowledge and still failed. The credential amplified the guilt instead of reducing it.

What credentials are you resting in — and has the resting replaced the living?

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

And art confident that thou thyself,.... Being vainly puffed up in, their fleshly minds, they were strongly persuaded…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

Behold - Having thus stated the general principles on which God would judge the world; having shown how they condemned…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Behold, thou art called a Jew - What the apostle had said in the preceding verses being sufficient to enforce conviction…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Romans 2:17-29

In the latter part of the chapter the apostle directs his discourse more closely to the Jews, and shows what sins they…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

Explicit exposure of Jewish responsibility, guilt, and peril

17. Behold Better, But if. A single additional letter in…