- Bible
- 2 Kings
- Chapter 17
- Verse 41
“So these nations feared the LORD, and served their graven images, both their children, and their children's children: as did their fathers, so do they unto this day.”
My Notes
What Does 2 Kings 17:41 Mean?
"So these nations feared the LORD, and served their graven images, both their children, and their children's children: as did their fathers, so do they unto this day." The FINAL VERDICT on the mixed population of post-exile Samaria: they fear the LORD AND serve their idols. Both simultaneously. Not one or the other — BOTH. The syncretism is total and permanent. It passes from generation to generation unchanged. The mixture becomes the tradition. The compromise becomes the inheritance.
The phrase "feared the LORD, and served their graven images" (et YHWH hayu yere'im ve'et pesileihem hayu ovedim — they were fearing the LORD and serving their carved images) is the DEFINITION of syncretism: genuine fear of God coexisting with active idol-worship. The fear of the LORD isn't fake — it's REAL but INSUFFICIENT. They don't replace God with idols. They ADD idols to God. The worship of the LORD becomes one element in a religious portfolio. God gets a seat at the table alongside carved images.
The phrase "both their children, and their children's children: as did their fathers, so do they unto this day" (gam beneihem uvenei veneihem ka'asher asu avotam hem osim ad hayyom hazzeh — also their sons and their sons' sons, as their fathers did, so they do unto this day) makes the syncretism GENERATIONAL and PERMANENT: the compromise doesn't resolve over time. It SOLIDIFIES. Each generation receives the mixture and passes it unchanged. The fathers' compromise becomes the children's tradition. The first generation's confusion becomes the third generation's normal.
Reflection Questions
- 1.What 'LORD and idols' coexistence have you settled into — and has the mixture become normal?
- 2.What does fearing the LORD AND serving idols simultaneously teach about the nature of syncretism?
- 3.How does each generation inheriting the mixture unchanged describe how compromise becomes tradition?
- 4.What would it look like to let God DISPLACE the idols rather than sharing space with them?
Devotional
They feared the LORD AND served their idols. Both. Simultaneously. Not choosing one or the other but maintaining BOTH — genuine reverence for God alongside active worship of carved images. The syncretism isn't confused. It's SETTLED. It's the permanent condition of a people who add God to their existing worship rather than letting God replace it.
The 'AND' is the devastating word: not 'but' (which would imply tension) but 'AND' (which implies coexistence). The LORD and the idols share the same worship-space without conflict. The fear of God doesn't displace the graven images. The graven images don't displace the fear of God. They COEXIST — comfortably, permanently, generationally.
The GENERATIONAL transmission is the tragedy: 'as their fathers did, so they do unto this day.' The compromise doesn't correct over time. It HARDENS. The first generation mixes worship out of confusion. The second generation inherits the mixture as tradition. The third generation receives it as NORMAL. By the time you reach 'their children's children,' the syncretism is so embedded that nobody remembers a time before the mixture. The compromise has become the culture.
This is the narrator's closing image of SAMARIA: not atheism, not pure paganism, but permanent MIXTURE. The feared LORD and the served idols share the same household — forever. The most dangerous spiritual condition isn't outright rejection. It's comfortable coexistence. The most stubborn syncretism isn't the one that's struggling. It's the one that's SETTLED.
What 'LORD and idols' coexistence have you settled into — and has the mixture become your normal?
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
Their graven images - The Babylonians appear to have made a very sparing use of animal forms among their religious…
So do they unto this day - This must have been written before the Babylonish captivity; because, after that time, none…
Never was land lost, we say, for want of an heir. When the children of Israel were dispossessed, and turned out of…
both their children R.V. their children likewise. A change which makes a semicolon necessary at the end of the previous…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture