“Alexander the coppersmith did me much evil: the Lord reward him according to his works:”
My Notes
What Does 2 Timothy 4:14 Mean?
Paul names a name. In a letter that will be read by churches, preserved by history, and canonized in Scripture, he identifies a specific person who harmed him. The naming is deliberate. The response is instructive.
"Alexander the coppersmith" — not just Alexander — there were many. The coppersmith. Paul identifies him by name and trade. The specificity means this person is known to Timothy and the community. He's not a faceless enemy. He's a real person with a real job in a real city who did real damage to Paul's ministry.
"Did me much evil" — the word "evil" (kaka) means harm, damage, injury. And "much" (polla) means it wasn't a single offense. It was sustained, repeated, significant. Paul doesn't specify the nature of the evil — it may have been false testimony, active opposition to the gospel, or personal betrayal. The details aren't given. The impact is: much evil. Enough that Paul names it in his final letter.
"The Lord reward him according to his works" — this is the response. Not "I'll get him back." Not "Timothy, deal with him." The Lord reward him. Paul hands the judgment to God. The verb (apodidōmi) means to give back, to repay, to render what's owed. Paul asks God to pay Alexander what his works have earned. The request isn't revenge. It's justice — the confidence that God keeps accounts and will settle them accurately.
Some translations render this as a prediction rather than a request: "the Lord will reward him." Either way, the posture is the same. Paul doesn't absorb the evil and pretend it didn't happen. He names it honestly. And he doesn't retaliate personally. He entrusts the response to the only judge qualified to deliver it.
This is the mature response to personal harm: name it. Don't deny it. Don't minimize it. And don't handle the payback yourself. The Lord rewards according to works. That's His job, not yours.
Reflection Questions
- 1.Who is your 'Alexander the coppersmith' — the specific person who did you much evil? Can you name the harm honestly?
- 2.What's the difference between naming harm honestly and nursing bitterness? Where's the line for you?
- 3.How does 'the Lord reward him according to his works' free you from carrying the dual burden of being both victim and judge?
- 4.Why is handing the case to God harder than taking revenge — and what makes it the better option?
Devotional
Paul was hurt by a specific person. He names the person. He names the harm. And then he does the hardest thing: he hands the case to God. Not to Timothy. Not to the church's legal team. To the Lord.
The naming is important. There's a version of forgiveness that pretends the harm didn't happen — that spiritualizes the pain into a nameless, faceless abstraction. Paul doesn't do that. Alexander the coppersmith. Much evil. The harm was real, it was specific, and Paul says so in a letter that will be read for two thousand years. Naming the harm isn't bitterness. It's honesty. You can't forgive what you refuse to acknowledge.
But the response to the naming is what separates Paul from revenge. "The Lord reward him according to his works." Paul doesn't scheme. He doesn't recruit allies against Alexander. He doesn't use his apostolic authority to destroy the man's reputation beyond what the truth requires. He states the facts and hands the file to the Judge. The Lord rewards according to works. The accounting is God's.
This is the template for handling people who do you much evil. Step one: be honest about what happened. Don't pretend it wasn't harm. Don't spiritualize the pain. Name it. Step two: hand the judgment to God. Don't carry the weight of being both victim and judge. You're not equipped for both roles. Let God handle the reward. His records are more accurate than yours, and His justice is more thorough than anything you could engineer.
Who is your Alexander? Name the person. Name the harm. And then hand the file to the Lord. His works are on record. The reward is coming. You don't have to deliver it.
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
At my first answer no man stood with me,.... Meaning, that when he made his first defence against the charges laid unto…
Alexander the coppersmith - Or, rather, “the brazier” - ὁ χαλκεύς ho chalkeus. The word is used, however, to denote a…
Alexander the coppersmith - We are not to understand this of any tradesman, but of some rabbin; for it was not unusual…
Here are divers particular matters which Paul mentions to Timothy, now at the closing of the epistle. 1. He bids him…
Dr Farrar's suggestion for the link of connexion is possible, that St Paul's second arrest took place at Troas, and that…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture