Skip to content

Ezekiel 17:15

Ezekiel 17:15
But he rebelled against him in sending his ambassadors into Egypt, that they might give him horses and much people. Shall he prosper? shall he escape that doeth such things? or shall he break the covenant, and be delivered?

My Notes

What Does Ezekiel 17:15 Mean?

Ezekiel 17:15 indicts King Zedekiah through the parable of the two eagles and the vine (17:1-10). Zedekiah, installed as a vassal king by Nebuchadnezzar (the first eagle), rebelled by sending ambassadors to Egypt (the second eagle) seeking military horses and troops. The rebellion was a double betrayal: political (breaking the treaty with Babylon) and theological (the treaty had been sworn in God's name — see 2 Chronicles 36:13).

The three rhetorical questions are devastating: "Shall he prosper?" (yitsalach — will he succeed?). "Shall he escape?" (yimalet — will he be delivered?). "Shall he break the covenant, and be delivered?" (haphir berith venimla — can he violate the covenant and still escape?). The expected answer to each is no. The logic is airtight: you cannot break a covenant sworn by God's name and expect God to rescue you from the consequences. The very God whose name you used to guarantee the oath is the God who will enforce the penalty for breaking it.

The Hebrew phar berith (break the covenant) uses the verb for annulling, shattering, rendering void. Zedekiah didn't merely stretch the terms. He shattered them. And the alliance with Egypt — the horses and the much people — was the replacement for the God he'd invoked and then betrayed. Egypt's military was the substitute for divine protection. The verse asks: when you've traded God's name for Egyptian horses, what exactly do you think will save you?

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Zedekiah broke an oath sworn in God's name. What commitments have you made — to God, to others, invoking something sacred — that you've since broken or are tempted to break?
  • 2.He sent to Egypt for horses as a backup plan. Where are you scrambling for human solutions to avoid consequences you created by breaking a commitment?
  • 3.The three questions all expect the answer 'no.' Where are you hoping to prosper, escape, or be delivered from something you know you earned through your own choices?
  • 4.The oath was in God's name. How seriously do you take the words you've spoken in God's presence or the commitments you've made that invoked His name?

Devotional

Zedekiah swore an oath in God's name. Then he broke it. Then he sent ambassadors to Egypt for horses and soldiers to protect him from the consequences. And God asks three questions: Will he prosper? Will he escape? Can he break the covenant and be delivered? The answer to all three is no. And he should have known that before the ambassadors left.

The pattern is painfully familiar: make a commitment, break the commitment, then scramble for a backup plan to avoid the fallout. The oath was in God's name — the most serious guarantee available. And Zedekiah shattered it, then ran to Egypt for horses. He replaced divine protection with military hardware. He traded the God he'd sworn by for the army he thought could save him. The horses were the substitute for the holiness he'd abandoned.

The verse asks the question your life is already answering: can you break a covenant and be delivered? Can you violate a sacred commitment and expect the consequences not to arrive? Can you invoke God's name as a guarantee and then treat the guarantee as disposable? The horses from Egypt might look like a solution. The alliance might feel like security. But the God whose name was on the broken oath isn't neutralized by your backup plan. He's the one who enforces what you broke. The Egyptian horses are coming. God's judgment is coming faster.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

Neither shall Pharaoh, with his mighty army and great company,

make for him in the war,.... The king of Egypt, to whom…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Sending his ambassadors into Egypt - Zedekiah must have sent his ambassadors into Egypt, between the sixth month of his…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Ezekiel 17:1-21

We must take all these verses together, that we may have the parable and the explanation of it at one view before us,…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

Cf. 2Ki 24:20. The king of Egypt referred to was Pharaoh Hophra, Jer 44:30; Jer 37:5 seq. The indignation of Ezekiel…