Skip to content

Genesis 20:9

Genesis 20:9
Then Abimelech called Abraham, and said unto him, What hast thou done unto us? and what have I offended thee, that thou hast brought on me and on my kingdom a great sin? thou hast done deeds unto me that ought not to be done.

My Notes

What Does Genesis 20:9 Mean?

Abimelech confronts Abraham: what have you done to us? What did I do to offend you? You brought a great sin on me and my kingdom. The pagan king rebukes the patriarch for deception — and every word of the rebuke is justified.

The irony is devastating: the father of faith is being morally lectured by a pagan king. Abraham, who walked with God, who received the covenant promises, who interceded for Sodom — is being called out for bringing sin upon someone else through his lies. The man of God created the problem. The man without God identified it.

"Thou hast done deeds unto me that ought not to be done" — Abimelech uses moral language that sounds like it comes from a prophet. He knows right from wrong. He can identify what "ought not" to be done. His moral compass is intact. Abraham's behavior is beneath the standard that even a pagan recognizes.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Have you ever been morally corrected by someone outside the faith — and was it deserved?
  • 2.Does Abraham's failure here challenge the assumption that believers are naturally more ethical than non-believers?
  • 3.How does Abimelech's natural moral sense ('deeds that ought not to be done') confirm Romans 2:14-15?
  • 4.What happens when covenant privilege produces obligation without character — and where do you see that?

Devotional

The pagan king rebukes the patriarch. And the patriarch deserves every word.

Abimelech calls Abraham to account: what have you done? You brought sin on my kingdom. You lied. You endangered my household. You did things that ought not to be done. Every accusation is correct. The man of faith acted worse than the man without it.

This is one of the Bible's most uncomfortable moments — because the roles are reversed. The covenant holder is the deceiver. The outsider is the one with integrity. The person who talks to God created the mess. The person who doesn't know God named it.

"Deeds that ought not to be done" — Abimelech recognizes a moral standard without Torah. He doesn't need Sinai to know that lying about someone's wife is wrong. The moral law is written on his heart (Romans 2:14-15) even without the written law. And his natural moral sense condemns what Abraham's covenant privilege didn't prevent.

This should humble every person who carries the name of God. Your covenant status doesn't make you morally superior. It makes you more accountable. And when a pagan can out-ethics a patriarch, the covenant has produced obligation without character — the worst possible combination.

Abraham had no defense. Abimelech had every right to rebuke. And the story sits in Scripture as a permanent reminder: belonging to God doesn't mean behaving better than people who don't. Sometimes they behave better than you. And when they do, the rebuke is deserved.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

Then Abimelech called Abraham,.... Who might be in the king's palace, being taken into it caressed by the king for the…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870Genesis 20:1-18

- Abraham in Gerar 2. אבימלך .2 'ǎbı̂ymelek, Abimelekh, “father of the king.” 7. נביא nābı̂y' “prophet,” he who speaks…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Genesis 20:8-13

Abimelech, being thus warned of God in a dream, takes the warning, and, as one truly afraid of sin and its consequences,…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

What hast thou done unto us Syriac Peshitto "what have I done unto thee," which suits the second clause rather…