Skip to content

Jeremiah 38:4

Jeremiah 38:4
Therefore the princes said unto the king, We beseech thee, let this man be put to death: for thus he weakeneth the hands of the men of war that remain in this city, and the hands of all the people, in speaking such words unto them: for this man seeketh not the welfare of this people, but the hurt.

My Notes

What Does Jeremiah 38:4 Mean?

Jeremiah 38:4 records the political establishment's case for killing the prophet. The princes present their argument to King Zedekiah: "Let this man be put to death: for thus he weakeneth the hands of the men of war." The accusation is specific and, from a military perspective, accurate. Jeremiah had been telling the city to surrender to Babylon (v. 2) — that anyone who stayed in Jerusalem would die, but anyone who went out to the Chaldeans would live. In a city under siege, that message was devastating to morale.

"He weakeneth the hands" — merappeh et-yedey — literally, he makes the hands slack, he causes the grip to loosen. The military language is precise: a soldier whose hands go slack drops his weapon. Jeremiah's prophecy was functioning as psychological warfare — except it was coming from inside the walls. "This man seeketh not the welfare of this people, but the hurt" — lo leshalom, not for peace/welfare. The princes frame Jeremiah as a traitor working against his own nation.

The devastating irony is that Jeremiah was the only person in Jerusalem actually seeking the people's welfare. Surrender to Babylon was God's prescribed path to survival. The princes' definition of "welfare" meant continued resistance — which would result in the city's total destruction. The one accused of hurting the people was the one trying to save them. The ones claiming to protect the people were leading them to annihilation.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Have you ever rejected truth because it felt like an attack rather than a rescue? What happened?
  • 2.How do you discern between a voice that weakens you destructively and one that challenges you redemptively?
  • 3.Have you ever been the 'Jeremiah' — telling someone a hard truth and being accused of seeking their hurt?
  • 4.What does this verse reveal about how institutions respond to prophetic voices that challenge their narrative?

Devotional

They wanted to kill the only man trying to save them.

Jeremiah was speaking God's word: surrender and live. Stay and die. It wasn't what anyone wanted to hear. In a city under siege, with soldiers on the walls and leaders rallying resistance, the prophet stood in the middle and said: stop fighting. Go out to the enemy. This is how you survive.

The princes heard treason. They heard a man weakening morale, undermining the war effort, seeking the hurt of his own people. And from their perspective, they weren't wrong. Jeremiah's words did weaken military resolve. His message did contradict every instinct of national pride and self-preservation. If you judge by the immediate, visible effect, the princes had a case.

But God's word doesn't operate by immediate, visible logic. The princes' definition of welfare was winning the fight. God's definition of welfare was surviving the judgment. The two were completely opposed. And the man who looked like a traitor was actually the last lifeline the city had.

You've encountered this dynamic. Someone told you a hard truth — leave the relationship, quit the job, stop the pattern — and it sounded like they were against you. It weakened your resolve to keep doing what you were doing. It felt like hurt, not help. But looking back, you can see they were the only one trying to save you. The voice that seems to weaken your hands might be the one trying to keep you alive.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

Therefore the princes said unto the king,.... The four princes mentioned in Jer 38:1, having heard what Jeremiah said to…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

For thus ... - Because he makes the men of war dispirited. No doubt this was true. Jeremiah, however, did not speak as a…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Jeremiah 38:1-13

Here, 1. Jeremiah persists in his plain preaching; what he had many a time said, he still says (Jer 38:3): This city…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

the men of war that remain Cp. Jer 38:38. The expression may indicate that many had gone over to the Chaldaeans, a fact…