Skip to content

Job 2:10

Job 2:10
But he said unto her, Thou speakest as one of the foolish women speaketh. What? shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil? In all this did not Job sin with his lips.

My Notes

What Does Job 2:10 Mean?

Job 2:10 is Job's second great declaration of faith under impossible pressure — and it comes in response to the worst counsel he'll receive in the entire book: his wife's suggestion to curse God and die (v. 9).

"But he said unto her, Thou speakest as one of the foolish women speaketh" — the Hebrew kĕdabber 'achath hannĕvaloth tĕdabberi (you speak as one of the morally senseless women speaks). The Hebrew naval (foolish) doesn't mean unintelligent. It means morally deficient — the same word used for Nabal (1 Samuel 25:25), whose name means fool in the ethical sense. Job doesn't call his wife a fool. He says she's speaking the way a morally senseless person speaks. The distinction matters — he addresses the speech, not her character.

"What? shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil?" — the Hebrew gam 'eth-hattov nĕqabbel me'eth ha'Elohim vĕ'eth-hara' lo' nĕqabbel (shall we indeed accept good from God and not accept evil?) is Job's theological masterpiece. The Hebrew qibbel (receive, accept, take) is applied equally to good (tov) and evil (ra'). Job treats both as things that come from God's hand. He doesn't explain why evil comes. He doesn't defend God's fairness. He simply states the logical implication of monotheism: if God is the source of good, He's the source of everything. You can't accept the blessings and refuse the suffering if they come from the same hand.

"In all this did not Job sin with his lips" — the Hebrew bĕkhol-zo'th lo'-chata' 'Iyyov bisĕphathav (in all this, Job did not sin with his lips) is the narrator's verdict. The phrase "with his lips" (bisĕphathav) is precise — what Job said was not sin. Some commentators note the specificity: his lips didn't sin. His heart's condition isn't assessed. The narrator validates Job's speech without claiming to assess his interior state.

The verse echoes 1:22 ("In all this Job sinned not, nor charged God foolishly") but with a slight narrowing — from "sinned not" to "did not sin with his lips." Whether this represents a subtle deterioration or simply a different narrative focus is debated. What's clear: Job's verbal response to devastating suffering remained faithful. Twice.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.'Shall we accept good from God and not evil?' How do you receive suffering from the same God who gave the blessings — without rejecting either?
  • 2.Job's wife suggested cursing God. He called it foolish speech. When has someone close to you offered counsel that felt compassionate but was spiritually dangerous?
  • 3.The narrator says Job 'did not sin with his lips.' What does it look like to speak faithfully about God during suffering without pretending the suffering isn't real?
  • 4.Job doesn't explain why evil comes. He accepts it from God's hand. Is acceptance without explanation possible for you — and is it the same as approval?

Devotional

Shall we accept good from God and not evil?

Job asks the question that most theology tries to avoid. He doesn't offer an answer. He doesn't explain why the evil came. He doesn't construct a theodicy. He asks a question — and the question itself is the theology.

If God is God — if He's the source of everything, the one from whose hand all things come — then you can't accept the blessings and reject the suffering as if they come from different sources. Either God is sovereign over both or He's sovereign over neither. Job holds the full weight of monotheism in a single sentence: we received the good. We receive the evil. Same hand. Same God.

His wife said: curse God and die (v. 9). The suggestion is understandable. She's watched her husband lose everything — including, presumably, her own children in chapter 1. She's watched the boils consume his body. And her counsel is: end this. Tell God what you think of Him and let the consequences come. At least the suffering would stop.

Job calls it foolish speech. Not because the pain isn't real. Because the conclusion doesn't follow from the evidence. The existence of evil doesn't disprove the goodness of the God who also gave the good. You can't build a theology on half the data. If you accepted God when the blessings came, you don't get to reject Him when the blessings stop.

"In all this did not Job sin with his lips." The narrator validates the speech. What Job said — the acceptance of both good and evil from God's hand — is not sin. It's the hardest possible faithfulness: receiving what you didn't ask for from the one you trusted for what you did.

The later chapters will show Job pushing much harder against God — questioning, challenging, demanding an audience. But here, in the ashes, covered in boils, his response to his wife is the most theologically mature sentence in the book: we accept both. From the same hand.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

Now when Job's three friends heard of all this evil that was come upon him,.... Of the loss of his substance, servants,…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

As one of the foolish women speaketh - The word here rendered “foolish” נבל nâbâl from נבל nâbêl, means properly…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Job 2:7-10

The devil, having got leave to tear and worry poor Job, presently fell to work with him, as a tormentor first and then…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

one of the foolish women The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. "Wise" is less an intellectual than a moral…