Skip to content

John 9:34

John 9:34
They answered and said unto him, Thou wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach us? And they cast him out.

My Notes

What Does John 9:34 Mean?

John 9:34 records the religious establishment's response to being out-argued by a beggar: "They answered and said unto him, Thou wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach us? And they cast him out." When they couldn't refute his logic, they attacked his pedigree. And when that failed, they excommunicated him.

The man born blind has just delivered one of the most devastating arguments in the Gospels. The Pharisees insisted Jesus was a sinner. The healed man responded with simple, unanswerable logic: "Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not: one thing I know, that, whereas I was blind, now I see" (verse 25). Then he pressed further: "If this man were not of God, he could do nothing" (verse 33). The Pharisees couldn't answer the argument. So they attacked the man.

"Thou wast altogether born in sins" — they throw his blindness back at him. In their theology, congenital blindness meant congenital guilt. You were born defective. You were born sinful. And you dare teach us? The people with the degrees and the titles and the institutional authority were being instructed by a beggar with mud still drying on his face. And they couldn't stand it. Not because he was wrong. Because he was right — and his rightness came from experience, not credentials. The excommunication — "they cast him out" — wasn't a verdict on his theology. It was retaliation for making them look foolish. They couldn't answer his argument, so they removed him from the community.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Have you ever been dismissed or punished for a testimony that people with more authority couldn't refute?
  • 2.How does the Pharisees' response (attacking pedigree when they can't answer the argument) mirror power dynamics you've seen in spiritual communities?
  • 3.Does knowing Jesus found the man after he was cast out change how you process rejection by religious institutions?
  • 4.What 'one thing I know' could you say — what undeniable personal experience of God — that no credential could override?

Devotional

You were born in sins. And you dare teach us? That's the sound of people with titles being threatened by someone with a testimony. The man couldn't quote the rabbis. He couldn't parse the theological arguments about sabbath law. He had one thing: I was blind. Now I see. Try to explain that away.

The Pharisees couldn't. So they did what institutions always do when they can't win the argument: they used their power. Cast him out. Excommunicated. Removed from the community. Not for being wrong. For being unanswerable. The beggar's simple testimony — one thing I know — was more powerful than their entire theological apparatus. And they punished him for it.

If you've ever been dismissed by people with more credentials because your experience threatened their system — told you weren't qualified to speak, that your testimony didn't count, that your background disqualified your insight — this man is your patron saint. He couldn't cite the right scholars. He could point to his open eyes. And that was enough to threaten an entire religious establishment.

The casting out isn't the end of the story. Verse 35 says Jesus found him. The institution rejected him. Jesus sought him out. The community that was supposed to welcome the healed man expelled him. And the Healer who was supposed to be condemned came looking for him. If you've been cast out for telling the truth about what God did — if your testimony cost you a seat at the table — Jesus finds the people the institutions discard. He always has.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

Jesus heard that they had cast him out,.... this being perhaps the first instance, of putting in execution the act they…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

Wast born in sins - That is, thou wast born in a state of blindness a state which proved that either thou or thy parents…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Thou wast altogether born in sins - Thou hast not only been a vile wretch in some other pre-existent state, but thy…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714John 9:13-34

One would have expected that such a miracle as Christ wrought upon the blind man would have settled his reputation, and…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

Thou wast altogether born in sins -In sins (first for emphasis) every part of thy nature (comp. Joh 13:10) has been…