Skip to content

Leviticus 10:17

Leviticus 10:17
Wherefore have ye not eaten the sin offering in the holy place, seeing it is most holy, and God hath given it you to bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the LORD?

My Notes

What Does Leviticus 10:17 Mean?

Moses rebukes Aaron's surviving sons for not eating the sin offering in the holy place. The offering was most holy. God gave it to the priests specifically to "bear the iniquity of the congregation" — to carry the people's sin through the act of eating the sacrifice. By not eating, they failed to complete the atonement.

The concept is profound: the priest bears the congregation's sin by eating the sin offering. The sacrifice goes into the priest's body. The sin that was symbolically transferred to the animal is now absorbed by the priest who consumes it. Eating is bearing. The meal is the atonement's completion.

This foreshadows Christ's priesthood with startling precision. Jesus — the ultimate High Priest — doesn't just offer the sacrifice. He absorbs the sin. He takes it into Himself. What the Levitical priests did symbolically (eating the sin offering), Jesus does actually (bearing the world's sin in His body on the cross).

Reflection Questions

  • 1.How does the priest 'bearing iniquity' by eating the sin offering deepen your understanding of what Jesus did on the cross?
  • 2.What does the unfinished meal (the sons' failure) teach about incomplete atonement?
  • 3.Does the visceral image (absorbing sin into the body) change how you picture Christ's sacrifice?
  • 4.How does 'he hath made him to be sin for us' (2 Corinthians 5:21) connect to the priest eating the sin offering?

Devotional

You were supposed to eat it. Because eating it was bearing the people's sin.

Moses is angry. Aaron's sons have refused to eat the sin offering — and in refusing, they've left the atonement incomplete. The sacrifice was offered. The blood was applied. But the final step — the priest consuming the holy meat, absorbing the sin into himself — didn't happen. The sin offering sits uneaten. The congregation's sin is unborne.

The theology is visceral: the priest bears iniquity by eating. The sin that was transferred to the animal is consumed by the priest. It goes into his body. The meal isn't nourishment — it's absorption. The priest takes the congregation's sin into himself so that it's carried, processed, and dealt with.

This is the Levitical shadow of what Christ accomplished. Jesus didn't just offer a sacrifice on the altar (the cross). He absorbed the sin. Into Himself. Into His body. "He hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin" (2 Corinthians 5:21). What the priest did by eating the offering, Jesus did by becoming the offering. The sin went into Him. All of it. And He bore it.

The unfinished meal in Leviticus 10 is a picture of what happens when sin-bearing isn't completed. The sacrifice is offered but not absorbed. The blood is sprinkled but the sin isn't carried. Jesus' work on the cross is the completed meal — the sin offering fully consumed, the iniquity fully borne, the atonement finished.

The priests were supposed to eat. Jesus did what they couldn't: He ate the full weight of the world's sin. And it's finished.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

Behold, the blood of it was not brought in within the holy place,.... When that was the case, indeed, the flesh of the…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

To bear the iniquity of the congregation - See on Lev 6:26 (note), etc.

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Leviticus 10:12-20

Moses is here directing Aaron to go on with his service after this interruption. Afflictions should rather quicken us to…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

and he hath given it you to bear[mg. to take away the iniquity of the congregation Two interpretations of this clause…