Skip to content

Luke 19:14

Luke 19:14
But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.

My Notes

What Does Luke 19:14 Mean?

Luke 19:14 is a single sentence inside the Parable of the Minas that reveals the root of all human rebellion: "But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us."

The parable describes a nobleman departing to receive a kingdom — a scenario Luke's audience would recognize from Herod Archelaus' actual journey to Rome to be confirmed as king in 4 BC, where a Jewish delegation followed to oppose his appointment. Jesus uses this historical echo to describe the world's response to His own kingship.

The Greek ou thelomen touton basileusai eph' hēmas — "we will not have this man to reign over us" — is the most concise statement of human rebellion in the New Testament. Not "we don't believe He's king." Not "we question His credentials." We will not have Him. The rejection is volitional, not intellectual. They know who He is. They've seen His works. They simply refuse His authority. The problem isn't evidence. It's the will. They hate the king and they send an official delegation to make their refusal formal.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.If you're honest, are there areas of your life where your real position is 'we will not have this man reign over us'?
  • 2.The citizens' rejection was volitional, not intellectual. Where have you disguised a refusal to submit as a question about evidence?
  • 3.Jesus frames this as a story you're inside of. When the King returns, which character are you — the investing servant or the rejecting citizen?
  • 4.What would full surrender to Christ's kingship look like in the specific area of your life you're currently holding back from Him?

Devotional

"We will not have this man to reign over us." That's the human heart's position statement, stripped of all its religious, intellectual, and philosophical packaging. We don't want Him in charge.

Notice: the citizens don't deny the nobleman's claim. They don't argue He's not qualified. They don't produce evidence against His credentials. They hate Him. And they formalize their refusal. They send a message. They make it official. This isn't a passive drift from God. It's an active, deliberate, organized rejection.

Every other form of unbelief is a dressed-up version of this sentence. The atheist who says "there's no evidence" — the evidence isn't the real issue. The spiritual-but-not-religious person who says "I just don't connect with organized religion" — the connection isn't the real issue. The church-goer who gives God Sunday mornings but keeps the rest of the week autonomous — the schedule isn't the real issue. The issue is the will. We do not want this man to reign over us. We want to reign over ourselves.

Jesus puts this sentence in a parable — not a theological essay — because He wants you to hear it as a story you're inside of. The nobleman has gone to receive His kingdom. He's coming back. And when He returns, He'll address both the servants who invested His resources and the citizens who rejected His reign. Which category are you in? Not which category would you claim. Which one does your actual life reveal?

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

And it came to pass that when he was returned,.... Which return was either in power to Jerusalem, in the destruction of…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

But his citizens - His “subjects,” or the people whom he was desirous of ruling. Hated him - On account of his…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

His citizens - Or countrymen - the Jewish people, who professed to be subjects of the kingdom of God.

Hated him -…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Luke 19:11-27

Our Lord Jesus is now upon his way to Jerusalem, to his last passover, when he was to suffer and die; now here we are…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

hated him And this was not strange, seeing that the very beginning of his reign had been signalised by a hideous…