Skip to content

Luke 22:63

Luke 22:63
And the men that held Jesus mocked him, and smote him.

My Notes

What Does Luke 22:63 Mean?

Luke records the mockery and beating of Jesus in the most compressed possible terms: "the men that held Jesus mocked him, and smote him." Two verbs — mocked and struck. The guards who were responsible for holding the prisoner used their access to abuse him. Custody became torture.

The brevity is itself a statement. Luke doesn't elaborate on the details the way Matthew does (blindfolding, asking "who hit you?"). He compresses the abuse into the shortest possible report, as if even the text doesn't want to linger on what happened. The restraint of the narration contrasts with the unrestrained violence of the event.

The men who mocked and struck Jesus were not the chief priests or the Sanhedrin — they were the guards. The lowest-ranking people in the judicial process felt empowered to abuse the prisoner. The cruelty cascaded downward: what the leaders authorized, the guards amplified.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.What does the brevity of Luke's account teach about how to narrate violence without exploiting it?
  • 2.How does cruelty cascade downward through institutional hierarchies?
  • 3.Where do you see custodial power being used for abuse rather than its intended purpose?
  • 4.How does Jesus' submission to mockery and striking model a response to unjust treatment?

Devotional

They mocked him. They hit him. Luke says it in nine words and moves on. The abuse that the other Gospels describe in more detail is compressed here into the briefest possible account — as if the text itself flinches.

The men doing the mocking and striking are guards — not judges, not priests, not political leaders. They're the bottom of the institutional hierarchy. And they feel completely free to abuse the prisoner in their custody. The cruelty flows downward: when leadership authorizes violence (even implicitly), everyone with access participates. The guard who mocks Jesus learned that behavior from the system that gave him the prisoner.

The compression of Luke's account is pastoral. He doesn't dwell. He doesn't elaborate. He records what happened and moves to the next scene. Some suffering is honored more by not lingering than by detailed description. The brevity protects the reader — and the victim — from the pornography of violence that detailed accounts can become.

Jesus is mocked by the people holding him. The hands that should have been neutral (guards simply maintaining custody) become hands that strike. The mouths that should have been silent (guards don't judge; they hold) become mouths that mock. Access to the prisoner was supposed to be a professional duty. It became an opportunity for cruelty.

Whenever power has unaccountable access to vulnerability, this verse describes what happens. The mocking and striking of Jesus is the universal pattern of custodial abuse: those who hold you can hurt you, precisely because they hold you.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

And as soon as it was day,.... See Gill on Mat 27:1.

The elders of the people; or "the presbytery of the people", that…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Mocked him, and smote him - This and the following verses are placed by Matthew and Mark before the relation of Peter's…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Luke 22:63-71

We are here told, as before in the other gospels,

I. How our Lord Jesus was abused by the servants of the high priest.…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921Luke 22:63-65

63-65. The First Derision.

Hanan had simply tried to entangle Jesus by insidious questions.

The course of the trial…