Skip to content

Romans 10:3

Romans 10:3
For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.

My Notes

What Does Romans 10:3 Mean?

Paul diagnoses Israel's fundamental spiritual error: for they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.

Ignorant of God's righteousness — the ignorance (agnoeo) is not lack of information. Israel had the Scriptures, the prophets, the law. The ignorance is failure to understand — specifically, failure to understand that the righteousness God requires is the righteousness God provides. They knew about God's standards. They did not understand that God himself supplies the means of meeting them.

Going about to establish their own righteousness — the word going about (zeteo — to seek, to strive for) describes active, determined effort. They are not passively drifting. They are energetically striving — working to create a righteousness of their own through law-keeping, moral effort, and religious performance. The pursuit is earnest. The direction is wrong.

Their own righteousness (idian dikaiosunen) — the emphasis is on own. The righteousness they pursue is self-generated, self-achieved, self-credited. It belongs to them — produced by their effort, measured by their standards, credited to their account. The problem is ownership: they want a righteousness they can claim as their own.

Have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God — the word submitted (hupotasso — to place under, to subject oneself to) reveals the core issue: submission. God's righteousness requires surrender — receiving what God provides rather than producing what you can claim. The failure to submit is not intellectual. It is volitional — the will refuses to surrender its own project and accept God's gift.

The verse identifies the universal religious error: replacing received righteousness with achieved righteousness. The error is not laziness. It is the wrong kind of effort — energy directed at self-righteousness rather than submitted to God's righteousness. The harder they try, the further they drift from the answer.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.What is the difference between knowing God's standards and understanding God's righteousness — and why could Israel have one without the other?
  • 2.How does 'going about to establish their own righteousness' describe earnest religious effort that misses the point?
  • 3.Why is submission — rather than effort — the key to receiving God's righteousness?
  • 4.Where are you trying to establish your own righteousness instead of submitting to what God provides?

Devotional

They being ignorant of God's righteousness. They knew the Scriptures. They studied the law. They memorized the commandments. And they were ignorant — not of God's standards but of God's provision. They knew what God required. They did not understand that God himself provides what he requires. The ignorance is not about information. It is about understanding.

Going about to establish their own righteousness. The energy is impressive. The effort is real. They are not lazy. They are striving — actively, determinedly, religiously working to produce a righteousness they can call their own. The problem is not the effort. It is the direction. Every ounce of energy poured into self-righteousness is energy aimed away from the righteousness God offers.

Have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. Here is the root: submission. The issue is not ability. It is willingness. God's righteousness is available — provided, offered, given through Christ (v.4). But receiving it requires surrendering your own project. It requires admitting that everything you built — every moral achievement, every religious credential, every performance metric — is not enough. And that admission is the one thing the self-righteous cannot make.

This is the hardest verse in Romans for the religious person. Not because it condemns the immoral. Because it condemns the moral — the person who is trying hardest, performing best, achieving most — and still missing the point. The righteousness God accepts is not the one you manufactured. It is the one he provides. And receiving it requires the one thing your self-righteousness prevents: submission.

What are you trying to establish on your own? What moral project are you building that you hope God will accept? The righteousness of God is available. But it requires you to stop building and start receiving. And that is harder than any law you have ever tried to keep.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

For they being ignorant of God's righteousness,.... Either of the righteousness of God revealed in the Gospel, which is…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

For they being ignorant - The ignorance of the Jews was voluntarily, and therefore criminal. The apostle does not affirm…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

For - being ignorant of God's righteousness - Not knowing God's method of saving sinners, which is the only proper and…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Romans 10:1-11

The scope of the apostle in this part of the chapter is to show the vast difference between the righteousness of the law…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

being ignorant of not knowing: the verb refers back to the "knowledge" just before mentioned.

God's righteousness His…