“Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations; according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be.”
My Notes
What Does Romans 4:18 Mean?
"Who against hope believed in hope." Abraham's faith operated in the space where hope had ended. Against hope — meaning there was no rational basis for expecting the promise to be fulfilled — he believed in hope. The faith wasn't based on evidence or probability. It was based on the character of the One who promised.
The phrase "against hope" (par' elpida) means beyond hope, past the point where hope was reasonable. Abraham was too old. Sarah was barren. Biology said no. Experience said no. Common sense said no. And Abraham believed anyway — not because the odds changed but because the Promiser didn't.
The purpose clause — "that he might become the father of many nations" — shows that the believing produced the becoming. Abraham's faith in the impossible promise was the mechanism through which the promise was fulfilled. The believing created the reality the evidence denied.
Reflection Questions
- 1.What promise from God are you holding that evidence says is impossible?
- 2.What does 'against hope believed in hope' look like in your current situation?
- 3.How do you trust the Promiser when the promise contradicts every visible evidence?
- 4.What dead hope might faith resurrect if you believed against the odds?
Devotional
Against hope, he believed in hope. When there was no reason to hope, Abraham hoped. When every evidence said the promise was impossible, Abraham trusted the Promiser over the evidence.
This is the most counterintuitive act of faith in Scripture: believing against the evidence. Not in the absence of evidence — against it. The evidence was clear: Abraham was nearly a hundred years old. Sarah's womb was dead. Biology had rendered its verdict: no children. And Abraham looked at the biological verdict and said: I believe the God who promised over the body that contradicts.
The phrase "against hope" means Abraham's faith had no natural support. He wasn't hoping because things looked promising. He was hoping because God said something. The basis for his hope was a word, not a circumstance. The promise was the only evidence, and the promise contradicted every other form of evidence available.
This is what faith looks like at its most radical: trusting a word when the world says the word is impossible. Believing a promise when the promise seems absurd. Holding onto hope when hope itself has died — and resurrecting it through sheer trust in the character of the One who spoke.
What promise are you holding that evidence says is impossible? What hope has died that faith might resurrect? Abraham shows the way: believe against hope. Trust the Promiser when the promise makes no sense. The believing creates what the evidence denies.
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
And being not weak in faith,.... Abraham was not weak in the exercise of his faith, on the promise of God; nor was his…
Who against hope - Who against all apparent or usual ground of hope. He refers here to the prospect of a posterity; see…
Who against hope believed in hope - The faith of Abraham bore an exact correspondence to the power and never-failing…
Having observed when Abraham was justified by faith, and why, for the honour of Abraham and for example to us who call…
against hope … in hope Lit. beyond hope … upon hope. Here perhaps the first is subjective hope, the second objective.…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture