Skip to content

1 Timothy 4:10

1 Timothy 4:10
For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

My Notes

What Does 1 Timothy 4:10 Mean?

1 Timothy 4:10 reveals the fuel behind Paul's relentless ministry — and it's not discipline or willpower. It's trust: "For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe."

The connection between the labor and the trust is causal: we labor because we trust. Not: we labor to earn. We labor because of who we've trusted. The Greek elpikamen means to have set our hope on, to have placed our confidence in. The living God — theos zōn — not a dead idol, not a theological concept, but a God who is alive, active, and present. The labor flows from the trust the way fruit flows from a root. The root is alive. The fruit is the evidence.

"Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe" — sōtēr pantōn anthrōpōn, malista pistōn — is one of the most debated phrases in Paul. How is God the Saviour of all men but especially of believers? The most common interpretation distinguishes between God's universal preserving care (He sustains all human life, provides rain and harvest, extends common grace to all) and His specific saving work (He redeems those who believe through Christ). God is Saviour of all in the general sense. Especially of believers in the salvific sense. The "specially" doesn't negate the "all." It narrows the focus within the broader reality. God's saving character extends to all creation. His redemptive salvation reaches those who believe.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Is your spiritual labor fueled by trust in the living God or by obligation to a religious system — and how can you tell the difference?
  • 2.How does God being 'the Saviour of all men' (in the general sense) change how you see His relationship with people who don't believe?
  • 3.Where has the reproach of following Christ made you question whether the labor is worth it — and does this verse answer that question?
  • 4.What would it change if you genuinely believed the God behind your labor was alive and active — not a concept but a Person?

Devotional

We labor because we trust. That's the order. Not: we trust because we've labored successfully. We labor — kopiaō, exhausting, sweat-producing work — and suffer reproach — oneidizometha, insulted, shamed, mocked — because we've placed our hope in the living God. The hope produces the endurance. The trust fuels the effort. And the God we trust is alive.

The living God. Paul specifies. Not a concept. Not a memory of a God who used to act. A God who is currently alive. Currently active. Currently saving. The labor makes no sense if the God behind it is dead or distant. You don't exhaust yourself for a theological idea. You exhaust yourself for a living Person who sees the work, honors the suffering, and guarantees the outcome. The aliveness of God is what makes the labor worth it.

Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe. God's saving character is wider than you think. He preserves all human life. He sends rain on the just and the unjust. He sustains the breath of every person on the planet, including the ones who don't acknowledge Him. That's the "all men" dimension. And then, especially — with focused, redemptive, eternal intensity — He saves those who believe. The general care becomes specific salvation. The rain becomes redemption. The preservation becomes eternal life.

If your labor for God has become joyless — if the work feels like grinding and the reproach feels pointless — check your trust. Not your schedule. Your trust. Are you laboring from hope in a living God, or from obligation to a dead system? Because the labor that flows from trust in the living God carries a different quality than the labor that flows from duty to a religious routine. One sustains itself. The other burns out.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

For therefore we both labour,.... Not in the word and doctrine, though they did; nor in the exercise of internal…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach - In making this truth known, that all might be saved, or that…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

For therefore we both labor - This verse was necessary to explain what he had before said; and here he shows that his…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–17141 Timothy 4:6-16

The apostle would have Timothy to instil into the minds of Christians such sentiments as might prevent their being…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

therefore we both labour In view of this, namely, our hope fixed on the fulness of the blessing of life from the…