Skip to content

Acts 13:50

Acts 13:50
But the Jews stirred up the devout and honourable women, and the chief men of the city, and raised persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and expelled them out of their coasts.

My Notes

What Does Acts 13:50 Mean?

Acts 13:50 reveals the specific social machinery of persecution: "But the Jews stirred up the devout and honourable women, and the chief men of the city, and raised persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and expelled them out of their coasts."

The Greek parōtrynan tas sebomenas gynaikas tas euschēmonas — "stirred up the devout and honourable women" — identifies the levers. The opposition didn't directly attack Paul. They used influencers — specifically, well-connected, religiously devoted women of social standing. These were Gentile God-fearers (sebomenas — reverent, devout) who had significant social capital (euschēmonas — prominent, of high status). The Jews weaponized their religious reputation and social influence to turn the city's power structure against the gospel.

"And the chief men of the city" — tous prōtous tēs poleōs — the male political leadership, activated through the women's social networks. The strategy is indirect: religious leaders influence prominent women who influence political leaders who authorize persecution. The chain of influence is deliberate, strategic, and devastatingly effective.

The result: persecution raised, missionaries expelled. Not through a theological debate Paul lost. Through a social campaign Paul was never invited to. The gospel was defeated in Pisidian Antioch not by better arguments but by better networking.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Have you experienced a social campaign against you rather than honest disagreement? How did you respond?
  • 2.The opposition used influential people to expel the missionaries. Where do you see social networking weaponized against truth in your world?
  • 3.Paul didn't stay to fight the social campaign. He moved on. When is it right to shake the dust off and leave rather than fight for position?
  • 4.The gospel survived the expulsion. Has something you were removed from continued to grow without you? What does that teach about God's sovereignty over social opposition?

Devotional

They didn't argue with Paul. They networked against him.

The opposition in Pisidian Antioch didn't challenge Paul's theology in public debate. They went to the women with influence and the men with power and activated a social campaign that expelled the missionaries before the gospel could take deeper root. The strategy wasn't truth versus truth. It was relationships versus message.

The specificity of Luke's description is telling: devout and honourable women. These weren't random citizens. They were religious women of high social standing — the kind whose opinion shaped community consensus, whose approval opened or closed doors, whose displeasure could mobilize a city's leadership overnight. The opposition went to the people whose social capital could accomplish what direct confrontation couldn't.

That's how persecution usually works. Not a frontal assault on truth. A flanking maneuver through social influence. The message is too strong to refute directly, so the attack comes through reputation, through relationships, through activating the right people who activate the right systems. By the time the target realizes what's happening, the expulsion is already authorized.

If you've experienced opposition that didn't come through honest disagreement — where the attack was social rather than substantive, where people you'd never met were turned against you by people you trusted — you're in good company. Paul was expelled by a network he never saw coming. The devout women and the chief men were doing exactly what they were asked to do by people who couldn't defeat the gospel on its merits.

Paul and Barnabas shook the dust off their feet (13:51) and moved on to the next city. The social campaign won a battle. The gospel won the war. The church in Pisidian Antioch didn't die — it just grew without the apostles present. The expelled message kept spreading. Because the gospel doesn't need social approval to survive. It just needs a few people who heard it before the networking started.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

But the Jews stirred up - Excited opposition. Honourable women - See the notes on Mar 15:43. Women of influence, and…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Devout and honorable women - It is likely that these were heathen matrons, who had become proselytes to the Jewish…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Acts 13:42-52

The design of this story being to vindicate the apostles, especially Paul (as he doth himself at large, Rom. 11), from…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

the devout and honourable women The conjunction is omitted in the best texts. Read, "the devout women of honourable…