“And thou shalt do to Ai and her king as thou didst unto Jericho and her king: only the spoil thereof, and the cattle thereof, shall ye take for a prey unto yourselves: lay thee an ambush for the city behind it.”
My Notes
What Does Joshua 8:2 Mean?
"Thou shalt do to Ai and her king as thou didst unto Jericho and her king: only the spoil thereof, and the cattle thereof, shall ye take for a prey unto yourselves." The Ai instructions differ from Jericho in one critical detail: Israel can keep the spoil. At Jericho, everything was under the ban — devoted to God through destruction. At Ai, the plunder belongs to the soldiers. The policy changed between cities.
The permission to take spoil makes Achan's sin at Jericho (chapter 7) even more tragic: if he had waited one battle, the same kind of plunder would have been legally his. The thing he stole from Jericho (costing his life and thirty-six soldiers') would have been freely given at Ai. The sin wasn't wanting the plunder. It was taking it before permission was given.
The military strategy — "lay thee an ambush for the city behind it" — contrasts with Jericho's supernatural approach. Jericho fell by shout. Ai falls by ambush. God uses different methods for different situations. The supernatural strategy at Jericho doesn't become the template for every subsequent battle.
Reflection Questions
- 1.What are you taking before God's permission that might be freely given at the next opportunity?
- 2.How does God using different strategies for different situations challenge formula-based faith?
- 3.What does the Jericho/Ai contrast teach about the temporary nature of restrictions?
- 4.What 'one more battle of patience' could save you from Achan's mistake?
Devotional
At Jericho: everything destroyed, nothing kept. At Ai: keep the spoil. The policy changes between battles. What was forbidden yesterday is permitted today. The timing is everything.
Achan's tragedy becomes even more painful in this light: the gold and garments he stole from Jericho — the theft that caused thirty-six deaths and his own execution — would have been legally his at the very next battle. If he had waited one city. If he had been patient for one more engagement. The plunder he died for was about to be freely given.
The different strategies — Jericho by shout, Ai by ambush — teach that God doesn't standardize His methods. What worked at Jericho (march and shout) isn't prescribed for Ai (ambush and attack). Each situation receives its own instruction. The obedience isn't to a formula but to a voice. Listen for the current command, not the previous one.
The permission to keep spoil also reveals God's generosity: the prohibition at Jericho was temporary and specific. God isn't anti-prosperity. He's anti-disobedience. The same God who said 'don't touch' at Jericho says 'take everything' at Ai. The restriction and the permission both come from the same Commander.
What are you taking before God has given permission — the Achan mistake? And what might be freely given if you'd just wait for the next instruction?
Commentary
Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.
And thou shalt do to Ai and her king as thou didst to Jericho and her king,.... Burn the one and slay the other:
only…
Israel were very happy in having such a commander as Joshua, but Joshua was more happy in having such a director as God…
the spoil thereof unlike the case of Jericho, is formally conceded to the Israelites.
an ambush "Put busshementis to the…
Cross References
Related passages throughout Scripture