Skip to content

Nehemiah 2:19

Nehemiah 2:19
But when Sanballat the Horonite, and Tobiah the servant, the Ammonite, and Geshem the Arabian, heard it, they laughed us to scorn, and despised us, and said, What is this thing that ye do? will ye rebel against the king?

My Notes

What Does Nehemiah 2:19 Mean?

Three opponents appear simultaneously: Sanballat the Horonite (from Samaria, political opposition from the north), Tobiah the Ammonite servant (an official with ties to the Judean aristocracy, institutional opposition from inside), and Geshem the Arabian (from the south, representing Arab tribal interests). The opposition is geographically comprehensive — north, east, and south — and socially diverse — a governor, an aristocratic insider, and a tribal leader. The wall hasn't gone up yet and the coalition against it has already formed.

Their response has three stages: "they laughed us to scorn" — vayyil'agu lanu (mockery), "and despised us" — vayyivzu aleinu (contempt), "and said... will ye rebel against the king?" — ha'al hammelekh attem mor'dim (political accusation). The escalation moves from emotional dismissal to political threat. First they mock — this is a joke. Then they despise — this is beneath contempt. Then they reframe — this is treason. The opposition isn't random. It's strategic: delegitimize emotionally, then threaten politically.

The accusation of rebellion against the Persian king is the most dangerous weapon. Artaxerxes had authorized Nehemiah's mission (2:6-8). The charge is false. But false charges don't need to be true to be effective — they need to create fear. Sanballat, Tobiah, and Geshem aren't trying to win a debate. They're trying to stop a wall. And the tools are ridicule, contempt, and the threat of imperial consequences.

Reflection Questions

  • 1.Where has opposition to something God authorized moved through the three stages: mockery, contempt, and political threat?
  • 2.The coalition came from three directions simultaneously. Is the multi-directional pressure you're experiencing evidence that the work is real?
  • 3.Sanballat, Tobiah, and Geshem reframed the building as rebellion. Where has someone reframed your obedience to God as a violation of something else?
  • 4.Nehemiah had the king's letter. What authorization from God are you carrying that the opposition is trying to make you forget?

Devotional

They laughed. Then they despised. Then they accused. That's the three-stage attack against anyone who tries to build something God has authorized. First the mockery — this is ridiculous, you can't do this, who do you think you are? Then the contempt — this isn't even worth taking seriously, you're beneath our notice. Then the political threat — you're in violation, you're rebelling, the authorities will shut you down.

You've experienced these stages. The idea God gave you that people laughed at. The calling that was dismissed as insignificant. And then — when it started to materialize, when the wall started going up — the reframing: this is dangerous, this is unauthorized, this needs to stop. The opposition escalated precisely because the work was progressing. The laughter was stage one. The threat was stage three. And the escalation tells you something important: the opposition is proportional to the progress. If nobody laughed and nobody threatened, the wall wasn't going up.

The coalition is three directions at once — north, east, south. The opposition surrounds you. That's not a sign you're off course. It's a sign you're building on every side of the city simultaneously. The wall threatens Sanballat's political control, Tobiah's social position, and Geshem's economic interests. If your calling threatens multiple power structures at the same time, expect a multi-directional coalition. And when the accusation comes — the political reframing, the claim that you're in violation of something larger — remember: Nehemiah had the king's letter in his pocket. The authorization was real. The accusation was fabricated. And the wall went up anyway.

Commentary

Trusted original commentary from respected historical Bible scholars and theologians.

Gill's ExpositionBaptist theologian, 1697–1771

Then answered I them, and said unto them,.... With much spirit and boldness, not at all intimidated by their scoffs or…

Barnes' NotesPresbyterian pastor, 1798–1870

Geshem the Arabian - The discovery that Sargon populated Samaria in part with an Arab colony explains why Arabs should…

Adam ClarkeMethodist theologian, 1762–1832

Geshem the Arabian - Some chief of the Arabs contiguous to Samaria, who had joined with Sanballat and Tobiah to distress…

Matthew HenryNonconformist minister, 1662–1714Nehemiah 2:9-20

We are here told,

I. Now Nehemiah was dismissed by the court he was sent from. The king appointed captains of the army…

Cambridge BibleAcademic commentary, 1882–1921

The Derision of the Enemy

19. Sanballat … Tobiah See Neh 2:10.

Geshem the Arabian A third prominent adversary of…